In Reply to: Re: You suggest a 16 square foot baffle and a 2.0 Qts. driver ... so would still need another speaker for bass below 50H posted by AJinFLA on February 5, 2007 at 17:58:44:
>Someone who wants their baffle to contribute
>to the sound as much as the driver?For 'high efficiecy' one would probably want the
whole 'baffle' full of drivers>RBNG - Who wants to use a 2.0 Qts. driver?
What does "RBNG" mean?
>Someone who appreciates high levels of driver
>distortion "enhancing" their "bass"? What if:
>"Yeah, but it sounds good"?You think you would have much distortion with
(from the standpoint of a 4' x 4' baffle)
(only considering the low end)
say 16 8" drivers with a Q ~ 2
(at a moderate level) ???????
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You suggest a 16 square foot baffle and a 2.0 Qts. driver ... so would still need another speaker for bass below 50H - hitsware 20:45:43 02/05/07 (1)
- Re: You suggest a 16 square foot baffle and a 2.0 Qts. driver ... so would still need another speaker for bass below 50H - AJinFLA 16:10:43 02/06/07 (0)