In Reply to: Re: And was right. And you have again broken your promise to Chris. posted by Jazz Inmate on June 26, 2002 at 19:40:37:
Not that it ultimately matters much what we post, in the scheme of things.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Only when SACD surpasses or equals CD in sales will you have been "right." - asdf 22:37:22 06/26/02 (14)
- SACD won't need to surpass CD... - Rich 22:59:56 06/26/02 (13)
- I hope you're right! But that rumor fell through. Any facts to point to? - Duilawyer 07:07:09 06/27/02 (3)
- That rumor didn't fall through... - Rich 07:33:07 06/27/02 (1)
- I sure hope so... - Aroc 10:31:23 06/27/02 (0)
- Tangibility isn't what wins arguments on the Internet - asdf 07:26:55 06/27/02 (0)
- Rich is right.. - rrsands 06:11:32 06/27/02 (4)
- No name-calling here - asdf 07:40:16 06/27/02 (1)
- Re: No name-calling here - Rich 07:47:49 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Rich is right.. - Rich 06:19:54 06/27/02 (1)
- Re: Rich is right.. - rrsands 07:32:20 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: SACD won't need to surpass CD... - 9fold 03:52:34 06/27/02 (1)
- If... - Rich 06:07:35 06/27/02 (0)
- SACD is as much about copy protection to Sony, as it is patent protection... - asdf 23:57:03 06/26/02 (1)
- You assume the profit margin has to be lower... - Rich 06:10:50 06/27/02 (0)