You can not post to an archived thread.
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]
In Reply to: Re: SACD equilivalent sampling rates posted by Rodney Gold on January 21, 2001 at 07:04:25:
Rodney Gold wrote:All in all , on both sides , the AD and the DA process , 24/192 is very gently acted on and will preserve the signal most likely the same as a DSD type process will.
No one has compared the same music/recording/mix via both processes , so one cant say whether the "pcm" method or the DSD method is better. Time will tell whichh remains dominant------
This is true. Until the same performance with the same mic feeds is coded to both DSD and 192kHz simultaneously, and this is offered to end consumers in both formats, there will be no way for the average audiophile to compare the two.
But, DVD-Audio does not have room for more than two channels at 192kHz. SACD can support up to six 64fs DSD channels. This apparent deficiency with DVD-Audio will probably be offset in the mind of the public by longer playing times available with MLP, but only SACD (in current configurations) is capable of full high resolution on all surround channels.
Follow Ups:
You can not post to an archived thread.
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]