In Reply to: RE: marantz SA-10 posted by fantja on February 18, 2017 at 04:40:23:
The Sony was intended to be the basis of a high end mch system that was subsequently abandoned through competing interest for funds.
The Marantz SA11-S3 came after the SA7-S1 and was hyped as being 'better'... it wasn't!
It is true that over the 18 year lifespan of SACD quite a few disc spinners have come and gone in my system, mostly Sony, Marantz & Esoteric. Not all have been bought new.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: marantz SA-10 - hiredfox 13:59:42 02/18/17 (18)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 05:23:33 02/19/17 (16)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - hiredfox 09:40:34 02/20/17 (15)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 06:19:39 04/11/17 (11)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - hiredfox 06:12:59 04/17/17 (10)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - airheadair 08:04:04 04/18/17 (5)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 16:54:20 03/05/18 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - Disbeliever 09:00:50 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - Disbeliever 08:52:25 04/18/17 (2)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - airheadair 11:51:12 04/18/17 (1)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - Disbeliever 12:28:03 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - hiredfox 01:51:47 04/18/17 (2)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 13:41:43 11/06/17 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - Disbeliever 07:18:21 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 06:52:49 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 13:04:25 03/03/17 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 05:08:44 03/02/17 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 14:01:10 02/28/17 (0)
- RE: marantz SA-10 - fantja 15:42:15 02/18/17 (0)