RE: Less than the cost per annum of the DV-50!

Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - inexpensive small footprint universal player? - Jim Pearce 15:57:39 12/01/16 (41)

RE: inexpensive small footprint universal player? - fantja 02:17:02 12/05/16 (28)

Less than the cost per annum of the DV-50! - Jim Pearce 05:23:13 12/05/16 (27)

RE: "the Oppo is just as good for music" - Ivan303 16:06:09 12/05/16 (23)

RE: My concerns with Oppo are..... - AbeCollins 17:14:31 12/05/16 (14)

RE: OPPO Players... - Ivan303 18:15:01 12/05/16 (13)

a side note... - Jim Pearce 07:22:40 12/06/16 (1)

RE: "love alt country"... - Ivan303 07:50:23 12/06/16 (0)

from Kal's 2011 review... - Jim Pearce 07:04:51 12/06/16 (10)

The new 4K Oppo doesn't stream Netflix, - oldmkvi 09:36:44 12/06/16 (5)

the 203 is the BDP-103 replacement... - Jim Pearce 10:04:07 12/06/16 (4)

Thanks for the good info! nt - oldmkvi 10:05:53 12/06/16 (3)

RE: Thanks for the good info! nt - Jim Pearce 18:31:51 12/12/16 (0)

another thing... - Jim Pearce 10:31:05 12/06/16 (1)

oh wait! - Jim Pearce 11:35:15 12/06/16 (0)

Admit to not having heard the BDP-95.... - Ivan303 07:45:09 12/06/16 (3)

It could be done... - Jim Pearce 08:32:26 12/06/16 (2)

50 lbs is a lot of packaging and shipping from Canada... - Ivan303 14:41:37 12/06/16 (1)

RE: 50 lbs is a lot of packaging and shipping from Canada... - fantja 03:29:09 12/09/16 (0)

cantankerous as ever... - Jim Pearce 16:24:42 12/05/16 (7)

RE: cantankerous as ever... - Disbeliever 05:25:52 12/08/16 (5)

De gustibus non est disputandum... - Jim Pearce 06:57:43 12/08/16 (4)

RE: De gustibus non est disputandum... - Disbeliever 09:01:28 12/08/16 (3)

the BDP-103 is entirely different... - Jim Pearce 09:35:10 12/08/16 (2)

RE: the BDP-103 is entirely different... - fantja 03:31:03 12/09/16 (0)

RE: the BDP-103 is entirely different... - Disbeliever 01:57:46 12/09/16 (0)

Before you throw it in the Garbage... - Ivan303 18:17:33 12/05/16 (0)

RE: Less than the cost per annum of the DV-50! - fantja 06:42:22 12/05/16 (2)

throwing it out! - Jim Pearce 07:34:47 12/05/16 (1)

RE: throwing it out! - fantja 13:25:42 12/05/16 (0)

RE: inexpensive small footprint universal player? - AbeCollins 18:50:20 12/02/16 (6)

RE: inexpensive small footprint universal player? - Disbeliever 13:31:52 12/03/16 (4)

RE: inexpensive small footprint universal player? - AbeCollins 14:51:21 12/03/16 (3)

RE: inexpensive small footprint universal player? - Disbeliever 00:02:10 12/04/16 (2)

RE: inexpensive small footprint universal player? - AbeCollins 05:31:22 12/04/16 (1)

RE: inexpensive small footprint universal player? - Disbeliever 06:18:08 12/04/16 (0)

amusing reading... - Jim Pearce 13:12:38 12/03/16 (0)

RE: inexpensive small footprint universal player? - samac 16:14:26 12/01/16 (4)

I'm out of date...again... - Jim Pearce 16:57:12 12/01/16 (3)

RE: I'm out of date...again... - Disbeliever 08:54:18 12/02/16 (1)

You read wrong... - Jim Pearce 10:00:36 12/02/16 (0)

RE: I'm out of date...again... - samac 17:56:04 12/01/16 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Less than the cost per annum of the DV-50! - fantja 06:42:22 12/05/16 (2)

throwing it out! - Jim Pearce 07:34:47 12/05/16 (1)

RE: throwing it out! - fantja 13:25:42 12/05/16 (0)

Post a Message!