In Reply to: It was my understanding that MQA doesn't matter... posted by Ivan303 on June 2, 2016 at 07:02:47:
by some as hires. I would class it as lowres being made to 'sound' better ?
In Audiostream, there are some 90 comments on the MQA review. Out of these, some 30 are from the reviewer who seems to be pushing it like no tomorrow. As he seems to be the only person supplied with a range of encoded music, the review is, to me, an unsubstantiated account of what was heard.
In time, more will be known and I hope that no one will rush in with orders for the new $20000 MQA enabled flagship dac.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I don't know why MQA is regarded.. - fmak 11:54:12 06/03/16 (13)
- RE: I don't know why MQA is regarded.. - Tony Lauck 19:04:02 06/03/16 (8)
- To be fair - fmak 02:16:22 06/04/16 (7)
- haha - PaulN 21:46:47 06/04/16 (6)
- It certainly hasn't paid off for him here! - AbeCollins 22:06:39 06/04/16 (5)
- I am getting older, Abe - PaulN 22:24:14 06/04/16 (4)
- RE: I am getting older, Abe - fmak 23:05:56 06/04/16 (3)
- so PM him (nt) - PaulN 23:25:12 06/04/16 (2)
- Funny & appropriate! - AbeCollins 08:37:11 06/05/16 (0)
- RE: so PM him (nt) -Ah - fmak 02:22:16 06/05/16 (0)
- RE: I don't know why MQA is regarded.. - ahendler 14:02:45 06/03/16 (3)
- $22000 - fmak 22:16:20 06/03/16 (2)
- Don;t forget VAT... - Ivan303 10:30:08 06/04/16 (1)
- RE: Don;t forget VAT... - fmak 12:34:31 06/04/16 (0)