In Reply to: RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? posted by jamestavegia@gmail.com on September 23, 2015 at 15:11:14:
I had already expressed my opinion on 24/44.1 land 24/48. No sonic advantage to me only Marketing posturing.
Jim Tavegia
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - jamestavegia@gmail.com 17:31:48 09/23/15 (5)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - cfraser 20:48:43 09/23/15 (4)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - jamestavegia@gmail.com 02:14:01 09/25/15 (3)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - cfraser 15:12:04 09/26/15 (2)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - jamestavegia@gmail.com 02:51:27 09/27/15 (1)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - cfraser 16:27:20 09/27/15 (0)