|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
|
|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? posted by Jon L on June 2, 2015 at 08:59:44:
I don't buy into the 24 bit 44.1 rates. The expanded noise floor is at the bottom of the dynamic range as "0" is still "0" and the theoretical 96 db is just that, theoretical. If you can hear some advantage I am happy for you. I doubt you can even buy a good 16 bit converter anymore, can you? A dynamic range of -144 db to -96 is of little consequence.
If on my own recordings I can get to -75db noise floor I am happy, and that is without a noise gate.
Jim Tavegia
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - jamestavegia@gmail.com 15:17:40 09/22/15 (7)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - jamestavegia@gmail.com 15:11:14 09/23/15 (6)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - jamestavegia@gmail.com 17:31:48 09/23/15 (5)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - cfraser 20:48:43 09/23/15 (4)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - jamestavegia@gmail.com 02:14:01 09/25/15 (3)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - cfraser 15:12:04 09/26/15 (2)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - jamestavegia@gmail.com 02:51:27 09/27/15 (1)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - cfraser 16:27:20 09/27/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
