|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
|
|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? posted by Jon L on June 2, 2015 at 08:59:44:
I expect these are not remastered but taken from CD master before it is reduced to 16-bits. As studios work at 48kHz it would be better if they offered the 48kHz 24-bit files but maybe it is easier for the label to grab the CD master file rather than go look for the original master. If that is true it would make an interesting experiment to see if those extra bits make a difference.
Regards
13DoW
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 15:05:42 06/02/15 (6)
- studios work at 48kHz... - Bill Way 16:42:03 09/27/15 (0)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - Tony Lauck 19:52:15 06/02/15 (4)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - cfraser 12:23:22 09/23/15 (0)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - DSG 07:29:12 08/14/15 (2)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - Tony Lauck 07:49:29 08/14/15 (1)
- RE: 24 bit BUT 44.1 KHz(?) "Hi Res" from HDTracks. SQ compared to 16bit/44.1? - DSG 11:26:09 08/14/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
