Home Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

RE: barking mad

Fitz,
I think the first, and main, reason that ripped DSD (i.e file-based playback) is better than listening to the same via SACD disc is...er...the player. An SACD player, in 90+% of the installations, is a jack-of-all-trades universal player with very little of its price-point (limited to begin with)invested in the analog stage and power supplies that follow what is usually a run of the mill SABRE DAC chip. Yes, the newer Oppos do better, and someone out there prolly owns a freaking Ayre $10k player....but by and large the DSD playback systems of the first 30 years of that format were limited (except maybe the flagship monsters created back at the inception). Now we have dedicated DSD-capable DACs, external power supplies, experienced design considerations (multibit designs, modern FPGA designs, proprietary one bit chips, even chipless analog filtering designs). Kind of the same argument as cd player vs dedicated 16/44 DAC playback.

Bit is bits, yes...but it ain't just bits. Obviously.



Edits: 03/31/14

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • RE: barking mad - ted_b 10:59:27 03/31/14 (1)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.