In Reply to: RE: Something is Wrong Here! posted by John Elison on March 12, 2014 at 20:47:17:
As Mel notes, something is so wrong with your Oppo 105 that even extended break-in time is very unlikely to bring it to acceptable standards.. The unit simply does not sound the way you describe it, despite a few posts here to the contrary.
I do have to say that the word "transparency" has me bothered a little. I recognize that "transparent" is the adjective du jour in many audio circles but to me (after hearing systems lauded as "transparent" at shows and elsewhere), it brings to mind words like "threadbare," "bleached" and "uninvolving." I'm sure you don't think of it that way, and that's probably a minority view. But in any event the 105 is, in my system, full-bodied, dynamic, very open, and quite sufficiently detailed without being "ruthlessly revealing." Just so you know where i'm coming from. And that's the stock unit. The ModWright version is a whole other story.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Send it back, John - Dave Pogue 05:30:10 03/13/14 (9)
- I agee with Dave... - rlw 06:40:33 03/14/14 (4)
- RE: I agee with Dave... - John Elison 11:27:09 03/14/14 (3)
- RE: I agee with Dave... - Mr_bill2 11:58:13 03/14/14 (2)
- The Oppo 105, as reviewed in TNT UK by Maarten van Casteren - Mr_bill2 13:02:54 03/14/14 (1)
- tweak in review question - sjg 13:59:16 03/18/14 (0)
- I'm going to break it in first... - John Elison 10:46:50 03/13/14 (3)
- RE: I'm going to break it in first... - Dave Pogue 11:18:31 03/13/14 (2)
- RE: I'm going to break it in first... - John Elison 12:09:30 03/13/14 (1)
- Goodbye John, - Dave Pogue 12:48:01 03/13/14 (0)