In Reply to: Re: You really think this implies cause and effect? posted by tunenut on July 2, 2001 at 17:43:16:
You might want to consider a DAC that a few astute audiophiles (over 40 people and growing)stretching from the New York area to New England and Chicago have fallen in love with including myself. This is a small underground group composed of music lovers who have been taken by the units performance on redbook. Sorry no print reviews available on this little gem.How good is it?
Pause with a smile.
Most have replaced their Dodsons and Perpetuals and in some cases their turntables because of it!
The Art DI/O 2 channel tube D/A converter is just under 1.5lbs. I have not mentioned this DAC till now for fear that the members of this board will criticize something they have not heard based on its low cost. Remember, if its not 20k, its not a serious audiophile product! And that is the beauty of this DAC, its inexpensive! And beats the crap all over the Dodson DAC! Did you catch this Chris? Could it be possible? What a smile I have.
Tip of the day:
When you buy it, pay attention to how you connect the unit to your sacd player. And be patient, great things happen after 4 week burn-in although you will know its flavor much sooner right out of the box.You can check with Sam Ash or any Proaudio shop on this unit. If you buy it, let me know what you think and more importantly how it rates when comparing your good redbook recordings with sacd.
Telefunkin anyone?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not necessarilly so...consider what a $200 DAC surprise can do.. - LA6 07/02/0119:02:14 07/02/01 (12)
- Intrigued but highly skeptical - tunenut 13:07:35 07/03/01 (4)
- Actually using the formula of....... - Chris Garrett 19:42:59 07/03/01 (3)
- Re: Actually using the formula of....... - Adi 12:52:25 07/04/01 (2)
- I guess anything is possible....... - Chris Garrett 00:48:18 07/03/01 (0)
- Can you PLEASE be specific... - SimonTJU 19:41:13 07/02/01 (4)
- From the back row: I thought SACD only had analog out for SACD? - Duilawyer (The real gsf!) 21:52:53 07/02/01 (2)
- Current SACD only had analog out for SACD - SimonTJU 22:06:00 07/02/01 (1)
- Thanks! nt - Duilawyer (The real gsf!) 00:06:15 07/03/01 (0)
- Re: Can you PLEASE be specific... - Adi 19:49:35 07/02/01 (0)
- Anyone replacing an analog front end because of a DAC is either lazy or had a bad set-up! (nt) - JCS 19:20:17 07/02/01 (0)
You can not post to an archived thread.