|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
|
|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Certainly SACD is better - if it's not, something is seriously wrong! [nt] ;-) posted by jazz1 on June 24, 2012 at 23:33:29:
Its so obvious that when you cut up the analog signal convert to digital and put back you lose some information no matter what the sampling rate is. Vinyl gives you the original in tact. I have proven to many people using the same sacd and vinyl and the vinyl is picked every time. I do like Cd's, Sacd, and xrcd's, but are they the ultimate software no. If you want to go for the best get the original 2 track tape.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Is SACD superior to vinyl? - ruxtonvet 13:12:55 06/24/12 (120)
- I think your vinyl rig needs improving. - jsm 14:44:54 07/16/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Scholl 16:59:47 07/02/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Karltoo 20:28:00 06/30/12 (2)
- well ... hopefully not the last time ... - TBone 10:42:50 07/03/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Disbeliever 00:26:38 07/02/12 (0)
- Even back when CD or LPs were new... - EdAInWestOC 12:32:27 06/29/12 (1)
- RE: Even back when CD or LPs were new... - TGT 13:12:52 06/29/12 (0)
- arguably, it's not even "superior" to CD ... - TBone 12:08:29 06/28/12 (45)
- I believe Jim Smith points out in his book, Get Better Sound - audiozorro 11:56:04 07/02/12 (41)
- RE: I believe Jim Smith points out in his book, Get Better Sound - Fitzcaraldo215 08:46:14 07/03/12 (1)
- RE: I believe Jim Smith points out in his book, Get Better Sound - Tony Lauck 09:56:46 07/05/12 (0)
- BS - Tony Lauck 18:31:59 07/02/12 (38)
- in my practical world ... - TBone 10:26:29 07/03/12 (37)
- RE: in my practical world ... - Fitzcaraldo215 14:52:16 07/04/12 (36)
- far too many ... - TBone 07:57:36 07/09/12 (35)
- RE: far too many ... - Fitzcaraldo215 08:32:12 07/10/12 (15)
- classical snobbery? - TBone 11:08:34 07/10/12 (10)
- RE: classical snobbery? - Robert C. Lang 22:47:25 07/12/12 (9)
- we are very different audiophiles ... - TBone 09:12:13 07/14/12 (8)
- Parallels with the incomparable Porsche 911 - Robert C. Lang 18:01:46 07/18/12 (7)
- RE: Parallels with the incomparable Porsche 911 - Fitzcaraldo215 08:46:04 07/19/12 (6)
- Sony blew it by not releasing an abundance of SACD rock titles - Robert C. Lang 22:42:16 07/20/12 (5)
- Right. - Kal Rubinson 06:47:09 07/21/12 (3)
- RE: Right. - Disbeliever 01:06:48 07/25/12 (2)
- You never seem to get the point. - Kal Rubinson 14:15:44 07/26/12 (1)
- RE: You never seem to get the point. - Disbeliever 21:48:34 07/26/12 (0)
- RE: Sony blew it by not releasing an abundance of SACD rock titles - Disbeliever 00:03:21 07/21/12 (0)
- RE: far too many ... - Disbeliever 09:12:18 07/10/12 (3)
- RE: far too many ... - Fitzcaraldo215 14:22:41 07/11/12 (2)
- RE: far too many ... - Disbeliever 23:34:47 07/11/12 (0)
- RE: far too many ... - Disbeliever 23:33:51 07/11/12 (0)
- Whoa! "faking hall ambiance"? ..Let me tell you what "faking" is - Robert C. Lang 01:03:57 07/10/12 (18)
- please get a grip on reality ... - TBone 06:07:56 07/10/12 (17)
- "faking hall ambiance" - Robert C. Lang 12:02:20 07/10/12 (16)
- again ... let's be clear ... - TBone 12:28:56 07/10/12 (15)
- Well, I'm rootin' for you - Robert C. Lang 17:34:19 07/10/12 (2)
- no need Robert ... - TBone 07:49:53 07/14/12 (1)
- Again not proselytizing....just some other points of interest - Robert C. Lang 01:09:13 07/16/12 (0)
- Wow. - Kal Rubinson 15:32:19 07/10/12 (11)
- c'mon KAL ... - TBone 16:38:46 07/10/12 (10)
- RE: c'mon KAL ... - Fitzcaraldo215 09:50:03 07/11/12 (1)
- spinning daftness ... - TBone 06:19:12 07/14/12 (0)
- c'mon - Kal Rubinson 17:07:55 07/10/12 (7)
- Sorry for repeating some of your points above TBone - EdAInWestOC 12:38:20 06/29/12 (1)
- RE: Sorry for repeating some of your points above TBone - TBone 07:50:20 06/30/12 (0)
- Agreed - Robert C. Lang 10:11:22 06/29/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - tmsorosk 05:57:00 06/27/12 (0)
- There are major differences between the same sacd on a universal player and off a hard drive. But - Norm 18:18:50 06/26/12 (0)
- Two Comments - Pete Watt 08:57:29 06/26/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - jazz1 08:18:17 06/26/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? in what way? - Erdo 14:37:57 06/25/12 (1)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? in what way? - Fitzcaraldo215 17:01:18 06/25/12 (0)
- Who cares? - Kal Rubinson 10:57:22 06/25/12 (10)
- RE: Who cares? - JTimothyA 13:25:08 07/01/12 (1)
- A rare exception. - Kal Rubinson 15:14:51 07/01/12 (0)
- The person who asked the question... - jfz 05:06:31 06/26/12 (2)
- It was a rhetorical question. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:54:02 07/01/12 (0)
- Good response! (nt) - Neil49 20:33:40 06/26/12 (0)
- Yes, but once you're hooked on vinyl resonance. . . - Chris from Lafayette 15:56:59 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: Who cares? - ahendler 13:51:14 06/25/12 (1)
- I am not the Editor. - Kal Rubinson 06:33:06 06/26/12 (0)
- That's what the old people in every generation say. /nt - bwb 11:56:51 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: Who cares? - Karltoo 11:38:29 06/25/12 (0)
- If given a choice and the same price for both - audiozorro 10:31:25 06/25/12 (10)
- RE: If given a choice and the same price for both - vinyl or 24/192 - JerryS 19:43:09 06/30/12 (3)
- RE: If given a choice and the same price for both - vinyl or 24/192 - Tony Lauck 18:56:45 07/02/12 (2)
- RE: If given a choice and the same price for both - vinyl or 24/192 - JerryS 19:36:01 07/02/12 (1)
- RE: If given a choice and the same price for both - vinyl or 24/192 - Tony Lauck 21:26:38 07/02/12 (0)
- For vinyl lovers it's the unmistakable vinyl *sound* that is the draw....more so than the cost - Robert C. Lang 10:57:06 06/25/12 (5)
- mildy disagree ... - TBone 13:15:09 06/28/12 (2)
- RE: mildy disagree ... - Robert C. Lang 00:00:47 06/29/12 (1)
- what's considered the "very best"? - TBone 07:20:48 06/30/12 (0)
- I agree, good vinyl is seductive (so is good music) - audiozorro 16:44:14 06/25/12 (1)
- **good multi-channel hi-rez audio trumps vinyl** - Robert C. Lang 17:21:21 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Thornhill 10:12:03 06/25/12 (1)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Tony Lauck 19:39:06 06/29/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Fitzcaraldo215 10:05:22 06/25/12 (12)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Jwm 12:33:45 06/25/12 (11)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Fitzcaraldo215 14:39:19 06/25/12 (10)
- I think you mean - Dr. Philosophy 13:21:21 07/26/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Jwm 16:34:33 06/25/12 (8)
- ****no home system sounds like the live event***.. Very true...but - Robert C. Lang 17:58:34 06/25/12 (5)
- dots ... - TBone 14:12:30 06/28/12 (4)
- RE: dots ... - Robert C. Lang 00:05:05 06/29/12 (3)
- RE: dots ... - TBone 07:45:34 06/30/12 (2)
- To make things even more daunting there is a varible we overlooked - Robert C. Lang 01:53:20 07/01/12 (1)
- RE: To make things even more daunting there is a varible we overlooked - TBone 16:23:42 07/03/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Fitzcaraldo215 17:29:36 06/25/12 (1)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Jwm 07:09:52 06/26/12 (0)
- RE: Never- - patrickU 07:44:13 06/25/12 (0)
- Maybe, but. . . - Larry I 06:02:39 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Disbeliever 23:01:47 06/24/12 (0)
- your ears aren't lying - Joe Murphy Jr 22:55:23 06/24/12 (0)
- with all due respect for your 69 year old ears - bwb 22:08:47 06/24/12 (7)
- RE: with all due respect for your 69 year old ears - tailspn 06:54:11 06/25/12 (6)
- RE: with all due respect for your 69 year old ears - bwb 07:38:15 06/25/12 (4)
- RE: with all due respect for your 69 year old ears - Tony Lauck 18:51:21 06/29/12 (0)
- RE: with all due respect for your 69 year old ears - ahendler 14:03:24 06/25/12 (1)
- RE: with all due respect for your 69 year old ears - vahe 19:20:03 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: with all due respect for your 69 year old ears - jazz1 08:33:23 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: with all due respect for your 69 year old ears - Disbeliever 07:08:54 06/25/12 (0)
- Certainly SACD is better - if it's not, something is seriously wrong! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 21:25:27 06/24/12 (8)
- RE: Certainly SACD is better - if it's not, something is seriously wrong! [nt] ;-) - jazz1 23:33:29 06/24/12 (7)
- *colorful* may be the operative description - Robert C. Lang 11:54:12 06/25/12 (4)
- RE: *colorful* may be the operative description - jazz1 13:32:34 06/25/12 (3)
- Agreed. Tubes and vinyl sorts go together.... to make for *extra realism* - Robert C. Lang 15:39:04 06/25/12 (2)
- In the JI system, tubes and SACD go together too NT - Jazz Inmate 06:53:13 06/26/12 (1)
- no "real" relationship between vinyl's quality & tubes ... - TBone 14:43:18 06/28/12 (0)
- RE: Certainly SACD is better - if it's not, something is seriously wrong! [nt] ;-) - Jwm 07:43:29 06/25/12 (1)
- RE: Certainly SACD is better - if it's not, something is seriously wrong! [nt] ;-) - ahendler 14:06:30 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - Jwm 17:30:13 06/24/12 (0)
- RE: Is SACD superior to vinyl? - RWetmore 16:23:53 06/24/12 (0)
- I'm kind of in your boat... - Chris Garrett 13:50:20 06/24/12 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: Certainly SACD is better - if it's not, something is seriously wrong! [nt] ;-) - Jwm 07:43:29 06/25/12 (1)
- RE: Certainly SACD is better - if it's not, something is seriously wrong! [nt] ;-) - ahendler 14:06:30 06/25/12 (0)
[Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2013, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Take5 ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]
