In Reply to: RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 posted by oldmkvi on March 27, 2012 at 10:20:31:
It's interesting how different folks zoom in on different portions of a review. I see your comments, but here is what I read in the same section:
Switching back to the Oppo ... stripped away any malaise or
congestion in the sound, revealing each instrument in stark detail and
delivering vocals with breath-taking clarity. ...the sound will certainly appeal to those wishing to sample the high end of high fidelity at a remarkably affordable price.
Also, this statement is quite positive to me:
The Oppo’s stance is one of detail and accuracy, with a firm yet dry bass line and exemplary clarity from mid to top. There were acres of space
between instruments, creatinga wide and three-dimensional soundstage that impressed from the first notes. The upper-midband and treble region was ruthlessly revealing, eking out every nuance of the recording and exposing any weakness in the mastering.
YIMV (Your Interpretation May Vary)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - srl1 10:45:47 03/27/12 (7)
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - Voice of reason 06:41:51 03/28/12 (0)
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - layman 13:03:53 03/27/12 (5)
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - Mikko Mattila 22:11:28 03/27/12 (3)
- Ruthless, Dry, Musical... - jfz 04:53:43 04/18/12 (2)
- RE: Ruthless, Dry, Musical... - Mikko Mattila 08:40:11 04/18/12 (1)
- RE: Ruthless, Dry, Musical... - nairb 11:02:29 04/18/12 (0)
- Good point... - Chris Garrett 14:35:49 03/27/12 (0)