In Reply to: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 posted by Mikko Mattila on March 27, 2012 at 07:12:55:
The phrases Cold air, and Stark detail do Not sound like praise to me. What is the point of comparing a $5000 player with a $1000 player? I was interested in the 95, but found some very negative comments here, about recessed sound, and uninvolving presentation.
I've got CD and SACD covered with my 5400/VSE, and don't want to spend $1000 on a Blu Ray Player, especially considering how much Netflix Streaming we do.
I want hirez sound on my Stereo, not that interested in hirez video. Everything looks fine to me on my Panasonic Plasma.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - oldmkvi 10:20:31 03/27/12 (8)
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - srl1 10:45:47 03/27/12 (7)
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - Voice of reason 06:41:51 03/28/12 (0)
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - layman 13:03:53 03/27/12 (5)
- RE: Hifi News & RR May 2012: Oppo BDP-95 vs Primare BD 32 - Mikko Mattila 22:11:28 03/27/12 (3)
- Ruthless, Dry, Musical... - jfz 04:53:43 04/18/12 (2)
- RE: Ruthless, Dry, Musical... - Mikko Mattila 08:40:11 04/18/12 (1)
- RE: Ruthless, Dry, Musical... - nairb 11:02:29 04/18/12 (0)
- Good point... - Chris Garrett 14:35:49 03/27/12 (0)