In Reply to: Your reading reveal a fatal flaw in your intelligence posted by jeromelang on January 10, 2012 at 00:08:09:
.
First I read you gave them away and then I read that you sold them. Since you only give part of the story each time you post and your story changes as you go why do you challenge my intelligence for calling you on it?
You're the one who brought it up. If you don't want to tell the whole story why did you post at all? Look at it from my side. Some guy posts that he gave away tens of thousands of SACDs and talks circles around why he did so. Then he says he sold them and even though he brought it up in the first place he refuses to identify himself or give a clear motive for doing so.
It sounds like a load of crap. Maybe it is not but the fact that you refuse to say who you are and why you did this means that I will remain skeptical.
Since you obviously don't want to give us the complete story this is a waste of time. good day
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- no, I took a test and they said I can read and comprehend very well - bwb 07:09:08 01/10/12 (2)
- It's ok - jeromelang 08:12:34 01/10/12 (1)
- RE: It's ok - Tony Lauck 17:48:29 01/11/12 (0)