In Reply to: Re: Doug Rich Article posted by nataraj on November 29, 2000 at 14:05:31:
I haven't heard high sampling rate music (24/192) so must go on others views who I have some regard for. In an article in Hifi News (a UK based magazine) the editor Martin Colloms and Tony Faulkner compared a variety of hirez outputs from an original recording from TF. The main outcome was that they found the higher the sampling rates the better the sound. The didn't find there was too much gain from more bits once above a certain level.
My own experince has been with 24/96 DADs and SACD.
I discount what I have heard at exhibitions as most of the DVD-As were not what they seemed; ie most were 24/96s although billed as DVD-A (24/192). I do not feel inclined to put too much effort into hearing the current DVD-A machines as all the reviews I have seen are lukewarm and seem to conclude that the medium is great but not in that machine. Jam tomorrow!!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Doug Rich Article - George Sallit 12:30:59 11/29/00 (3)Follow Ups
- Re: Doug Rich Article - George Sallit 12:07:35 11/30/00 (0)
You can not post to an archived thread.