not complete - Michael Bishop

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - Duilawyer 18:27:00 01/09/04 (119)

I'm waiting for the apology/slaps his forehead post. - detayls 16:53:04 01/12/04 (0)

So you found an SACD that's no better than the CD, what do you want? A cookie? - sxr71 00:40:43 01/12/04 (0)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek = PCM source - Michael Bishop 08:26:57 01/11/04 (3)

Liner Notes Aren't Reliable? - randyC 11:04:20 01/12/04 (1)

not complete - Michael Bishop 18:12:11 01/12/04 (0)

Nickel Creek Surround Mix - bmoura 19:49:59 01/11/04 (0)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - oldmkvi 12:27:10 01/10/04 (0)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - triple_A 11:52:38 01/10/04 (0)

Multichannel = big difference - Bobby_N 10:29:24 01/10/04 (0)

I am listening to Nickel Creek DSD layer right now... - panorama 07:47:15 01/10/04 (2)

You get the "I don't get it" prize. Put on the redbook layer. - Duilawyer 08:58:46 01/10/04 (1)

I did. You know what??? It sounds better on DSD....and guess what else? - panorama 09:03:37 01/10/04 (0)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - Khorn 07:40:14 01/10/04 (4)

Non-answer. "The difference is one you.. - Duilawyer 09:00:39 01/10/04 (3)

Ok, You want to play stupid games: PROVE to us that.... - Khorn 10:28:55 01/10/04 (2)

Hearing acuity? - Jack Seaton 21:10:31 01/10/04 (0)

Re: Ok, You want to play stupid games: PROVE to us that.... - regmac 11:37:06 01/10/04 (0)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - regmac 07:13:53 01/10/04 (17)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - Peter 11:52:10 01/10/04 (10)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - regmac 13:13:15 01/10/04 (9)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - Peter 03:28:41 01/11/04 (4)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - regmac 09:37:13 01/11/04 (3)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - Peter 00:33:49 01/12/04 (0)

Tone it down a little or I'll start deleting posts which aren't in the spirit of the rules... - Ted Smith 13:26:19 01/11/04 (1)

Re: Tone it down a little or I'll start deleting posts which aren't in the spirit of the rules... - Peter 03:21:24 01/12/04 (0)

Have you compared the XB940 with and without? - Stephen 16:28:11 01/10/04 (1)

Re: Have you compared the XB940 with and without? - Peter 03:32:07 01/11/04 (0)

Boy, you woke up on DUI's side of the bed today! [nt] - Ted Smith 13:20:20 01/10/04 (1)

Let's hope it was a different bed. nt - Methos 19:00:48 01/10/04 (0)

Where does my 555 rate-affordable, or high end? - Duilawyer 09:09:06 01/10/04 (5)

Re: Where does my 555 rate-affordable, or high end? - Peter 03:44:07 01/11/04 (0)

Re: Where does my 555 rate-affordable, or high end? - regmac 11:28:35 01/10/04 (3)

Re: Where does my 555 rate-affordable, or high end? - Khorn 06:43:16 01/11/04 (0)

Re: Where does my 555 rate-affordable, or high end? - Ted Smith 11:48:01 01/10/04 (1)

Ditto! - oldmkvi 12:30:06 01/10/04 (0)

I believe it was Marie Antoinette who said, - sgb 06:54:11 01/10/04 (0)

Here we go again..... - MT 06:41:17 01/10/04 (4)

No, others always move it from music\hi rez, to personal attacks. - Duilawyer 09:06:17 01/10/04 (2)

...and there are a few who simply wonder why you're demanding to have subjective judgements objectified. - Methos 11:06:18 01/10/04 (1)

Whichever Format Is Cheaper - Robertc88 09:17:53 01/11/04 (0)

A Lawyer Perhaps But Cannot Get His Money Back! - Robertc88 07:54:47 01/10/04 (0)

You know those prints that mimic the topography of the original paintings? - Penguin 06:38:45 01/10/04 (1)

Excellent analogy. (nt) - Dalton 11:28:36 01/10/04 (0)

Easy, DUI - Eric LeRouge 05:29:21 01/10/04 (15)

Thanks. Can't $hoot for the Offrande. :-) nt - Duilawyer 09:29:08 01/10/04 (1)

There's always the used market if that's what you want - Eric LeRouge 11:55:24 01/11/04 (0)

Re: Easy, DUI - smargo 06:58:27 01/10/04 (1)

I thought I was being practical - Eric LeRouge 07:01:51 01/10/04 (0)

you french Eric? trying to work on my french... - NonA 06:02:20 01/10/04 (10)

TrÃ¨s franÃ§ais, monsieur Anon.. - Eric LeRouge 07:00:13 01/10/04 (9)

Merci bien pour ton offre mon chere EricL. - NonA 10:37:41 01/10/04 (3)

intÃ©ressant... - Eric LeRouge 08:04:50 01/11/04 (0)

Never mind, I found the CD (screw the SACD) - NonA 11:58:19 01/10/04 (1)

Re: Never mind, I found the CD (screw the SACD) - Eric LeRouge 07:54:03 01/11/04 (0)

Re: TrÃ¨s franÃ§ais, monsieur Anon.. - patrickU 09:08:45 01/10/04 (4)

I agree, Patrick.. - Eric LeRouge 08:07:58 01/11/04 (3)

Re: I agree, Patrick.. - patrickU 08:12:13 01/11/04 (2)

Ballet? - Eric LeRouge 11:46:57 01/11/04 (1)

Re: Ballet? - patrickU 12:26:02 01/11/04 (0)

Here is what I hear - theob 04:51:58 01/10/04 (0)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - cf@tiscali.se 03:54:44 01/10/04 (0)

Have You Compared Any Of The MoFi Recordings? - Robertc88 03:50:23 01/10/04 (0)

You have demonstarted time and again that you have tin ears, not golden ears. - oldmkvi 23:49:27 01/09/04 (0)

Re: CD vs. SACD-Nickel Creek-no sonic difference. - smargo 23:10:36 01/09/04 (0)

Final score: 12 posts, by 5 members-not one fact\example. - Duilawyer 22:43:54 01/09/04 (2)

Here's one I gave you a long time ago... - rebop 08:58:18 01/10/04 (0)

You've got us beat, I admit - Stephen 22:49:24 01/09/04 (0)

Perhaps you should... - Jim Treanor 22:23:20 01/09/04 (6)

Another non-answer. We'll call that, an "I don't know, but - Duilawyer 22:33:51 01/09/04 (5)

Not an attempt to answer...simply an observation... - Jim Treanor 10:50:01 01/10/04 (4)

Re: Not an attempt to answer...simply an observation... - regmac 11:41:29 01/11/04 (3)

why bother? - tunenut 15:41:15 01/11/04 (2)

Re: why bother? - regmac 18:29:26 01/11/04 (1)

Re: why bother? - Ted Smith 19:59:40 01/11/04 (0)

Viva la difference - John B 20:53:06 01/09/04 (0)

I hear quite a difference continuously, sorry if you don't - Ted Smith 19:12:30 01/09/04 (7)

Odd; I did a search under "Nickel" and there are no posts in your name. - Duilawyer 19:24:17 01/09/04 (5)

I hear the same differences on each disk... - Ted Smith 21:48:58 01/09/04 (4)

"the same differences on each disk" AGAIN: Which disc? Nickel Creek? - Duilawyer 22:32:45 01/09/04 (3)

Re: "the same differences on each disk" AGAIN: Which disc? Nickel Creek? - Ted Smith 11:14:23 01/10/04 (2)

Agreed..but.. - SoftwireEngineer 16:21:46 01/10/04 (1)

Re: Agreed..but.. - Ted Smith 16:37:10 01/10/04 (0)

"I'm not going to list the differences again "; Just one??!! - Duilawyer 19:16:35 01/09/04 (0)

We got it already... - honshued 18:52:19 01/09/04 (31)

The "but you buy them" has been answered here endlessly - Duilawyer 19:01:41 01/09/04 (30)

Dui, I am a supporter of both formats and would like to say... - rick5 20:50:59 01/09/04 (8)

Much Cheaper To Upgrade Hardware - Robertc88 06:15:48 01/10/04 (0)

Great post, BTW. nt. - Duilawyer 21:38:06 01/09/04 (0)

Good examples. Give me a time and track. Pick attack when? - Duilawyer 21:35:59 01/09/04 (5)

nothing to do with sacd - hifitommy 22:22:50 01/09/04 (4)

nice words, but no truth to it. - Duilawyer 22:39:34 01/09/04 (3)

it sounds like - hifitommy 08:50:24 01/10/04 (0)

Say What? - honshued 00:18:21 01/10/04 (0)

Objection - Jazz Inmate 23:54:42 01/09/04 (0)

I would say that whole albums sound different on SACD, not just isolated passages... - Methos 20:22:17 01/09/04 (9)

LOL: That is the dumbest weasely dodge ever. - Duilawyer 20:28:19 01/09/04 (8)

Bet you've got Gaucho. How about it, then? I'll list some differences, you tell me you can't hear them. :-) nt - Methos 21:15:35 01/09/04 (4)

On this one, I can plainly hear a tram go past at 1:06 into track 7 (nt) - Stephen 21:24:30 01/09/04 (3)

No sh*t? Once Dui verifies possession of this disc, I'll check on that. :-) nt - Methos 21:30:15 01/09/04 (2)

I'll have to get a copy too! (nt) - Stephen 21:32:57 01/09/04 (1)

...so you can hear the tram...and Fagan's fart at :07 of track 2. nt - Methos 21:35:40 01/09/04 (1)

Nothing weasely about admitting I don't have the album to compare, is there dui? - Methos 20:41:41 01/09/04 (2)

How many replies have you posted? How many ANSWERS? 0. - Duilawyer 22:38:05 01/09/04 (1)

It looks like you're the one who's dodging, dui...I offered to take you up on your challenge, you said nothing in reply. - Methos 23:42:23 01/09/04 (0)

Would you be so kind as to answer it one more time? (nt) - honshued 19:23:14 01/09/04 (10)

Re: Would you be so kind as to answer it one more time? (nt) - Duilawyer 19:44:13 01/09/04 (9)

Re: Would you be so kind as to answer it one more time? (nt) - Stephen 20:22:34 01/09/04 (2)

AGAIN, no track, no time. No specifics, just insults. - Duilawyer 20:33:14 01/09/04 (1)

Don't tell anybody I told you this ... - Stephen 21:02:00 01/09/04 (0)

Thanks, but on my system... - honshued 20:17:33 01/09/04 (5)

Player Better For Redbook - Robertc88 06:28:36 01/10/04 (0)

Uhm, possible explanation. I like it! Tracks and times? - Duilawyer 20:24:28 01/09/04 (3)

What part of every track of every hybrid I own didn`t you quite understand? - honshued 20:51:39 01/09/04 (2)

Still you have dodged? Which track, which instrument? - Duilawyer 22:46:01 01/09/04 (1)

Track 1 The Who:Tommy (drums)..... - honshued 23:05:53 01/09/04 (0)

You'd be a sucker to buy any more, right? (nt) - Stephen 18:30:00 01/09/04 (3)

I hope he agrees with you. Silence would be golden. nt - Biencfg 19:28:19 01/09/04 (1)

Put up or shut up. Tracks? Times? Sonic difference? - Duilawyer 20:35:00 01/09/04 (0)

See my post, above. nt - Duilawyer 19:03:15 01/09/04 (0)

Follow Ups

not complete - Michael Bishop 18:12:11 01/12/04 (0)