My DV-50 came in today, and since our new house isn't ready, I took it to my brother's house. He has an enormous listening room, and his Paradigm 100s, Bryston 4B-ST and BP-25 with his usual player, the Arcam FMJCD23 produce what I thought was an impressive soundstage. We simply plugged the player in where he usually puts his DVD player - the Philips 963A - and threw on Reference Recordings' RR-95CD, Respighi. I wanted to know if I would regret buying a player without HDCD decoding. Well, I soon forgot about that. The soundstage was simply enormous, the speakers disappeared to an extent I've never experienced and the sound was transparent beyond anything I've previously heard from CD. We played back the first four minutes of Solomon's dream on the Arcam, and it sounded to be struggling by comparison.We put on the SACD of Patricia Barber's Cafe Blue, and again I was struck by the transparency of the sound. My memory of the same record on my Marantz SA-14 was of a much muddier sound with a flatter soundstage. I tried La Stavaganza as well, and again I had the same impression: while the SA-14 has a warm and dynamic sound, this player has a smooth, clear, dynamic and utterly transparent sound.
The real shocker was The Trinity Sessions. The ambience and the sheer presence of Margo Timmins' voice was as good as anything I've heard from a disc, regardless of format. We threw on Mighty Sam's Journey and listened to There's a New Man in Town, because I wondered whether this player could rock and could it ever. The Hammond organ and the horns in particular exhibited the kind of natural timbre I associate with DVD-A and SACD. I played the stereo track (48/16 PCM) on the DVD-V disc of Rattle conducting Mahler's Fifth on EMI just to make sure the thing could produce a picture, which it can - although it is not obviuosly any better or worse than the Philips 963A.
I used the RDOT + FIR filter setting throughout. I can't wait to get this thing into my new 5.1 system, but I'm a little disappointed by one thing: I'm not sure I can look forward to the usual break-in courtship with this player. I just don't think it will get better. And no, I haven't heard the Meitner equipment, so there is no implied comparison.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Another ecstatic Esoteric DV-50 post - Jim Pearce 21:05:00 09/30/03 (37)
- Jim, Is your SA-14 the version 1 or version 2 ? (NT) - Kelvin K 08:12:01 10/02/03 (1)
- Re: Jim, Is your SA-14 the version 1 or version 2 ? v.1(NT) - Jim Pearce 09:58:49 10/02/03 (0)
- Re: Another ecstatic Esoteric DV-50 post - bigLP 14:11:50 10/01/03 (1)
- No, my point was that the CD sounded that good.nt - Jim Pearce 09:57:53 10/02/03 (0)
- Re: Another ecstatic Esoteric DV-50 post - bmoura 10:05:26 10/01/03 (2)
- What amps were used in this demo? - Biencfg 20:26:15 10/02/03 (0)
- Brian, I read your story at the time... - Jim Pearce 11:36:59 10/01/03 (0)
- Re: Another ecstatic Esoteric DV-50 post - reb 06:24:51 10/01/03 (0)
- Re: Another ecstatic Esoteric DV-50 post - KGS 05:44:04 10/01/03 (0)
- Take Note: Those who are thinking of buying the Teac. - Audiocrazed 01:03:20 10/01/03 (20)
- Richard, anytime you are ready with a 5.1 mod... - Jim Pearce 05:57:40 10/01/03 (11)
- Re: Richard, anytime you are ready with a 5.1 mod... - Audiocrazed 14:01:29 10/01/03 (10)
- Re: Richard, anytime you are ready with a 5.1 mod... - reb 15:58:21 10/01/03 (9)
- Re: Richard, anytime you are ready with a 5.1 mod... - Audiocrazed 18:01:19 10/01/03 (8)
- Re: Richard, anytime you are ready with a 5.1 mod... - reb 18:15:07 10/01/03 (7)
- Teac Service does not have any parts for this machine. - Audiocrazed 19:57:38 10/01/03 (6)
- Re: Teac Service does not have any parts for this machine. - reb 20:09:05 10/01/03 (5)
- Teac DV-50 - Audiocrazed 22:48:30 10/01/03 (4)
- MC board vs. stereo board - Jim Pearce 08:19:09 10/02/03 (3)
- Re: MC board vs. stereo board - reb 17:15:44 10/02/03 (1)
- As far as I know - Audiocrazed 20:17:38 10/02/03 (0)
- Re: MC board vs. stereo board - Audiocrazed 14:56:24 10/02/03 (0)
- Stage 5 ... we're really racing along! (nt) - Stephen 05:35:16 10/01/03 (5)
- Stephen, you'll be at 9 any day now. - Jim Pearce 05:59:39 10/01/03 (4)
- A bit beyond my reach, I'm afraid. - Stephen 06:44:25 10/01/03 (3)
- A little perspective... - Jim Pearce 07:11:58 10/01/03 (2)
- If they came out with a comparable box ... - Stephen 07:27:54 10/01/03 (1)
- Re: If they came out with a comparable box ... - reb 13:43:12 10/01/03 (0)
- Capacitor Improvement - KGS 05:27:39 10/01/03 (1)
- Re: Capacitor Improvement - Audiocrazed 14:10:04 10/01/03 (0)
- Just made an appointment to audition DV-50 two days from now - DkB 00:33:56 10/01/03 (1)
- Re: Please post your impressions of the DV-50 after your audition. <nt> - perose 09:45:38 10/01/03 (0)
- Re: Another ecstatic Esoteric DV-50 post - Alan Hsu 23:06:17 09/30/03 (3)
- The bass sounded good to me. - Jim Pearce 06:02:28 10/01/03 (2)
- Re: The bass sounded good to me. - splaskin 18:41:36 10/01/03 (0)
- I concur (nt) - KGS 06:14:16 10/01/03 (0)
- Re: Another ecstatic Esoteric DV-50 post - Ted Smith 23:05:19 09/30/03 (0)