Home DVD-Audiobahn

New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players.

Re: No, You're Spouting Nonsense. Read...

195.92.168.165

Yes, I've heard DTS 96/24, at home and at shows. If you think it's superior to regular DTS, you fell for the marketing hype or are hearing a souped-up mix.

You need to read "Backward Compatible Enhancement of DTS Multi-Channel Audio Coding That Delivers 96-kHz / 24-Bit Audio Quality" by Zoran Fejzo, Stephen Smyth, Keith McDowell, Yu-Li You, and Paul Smith - Digital Theater Systems, Inc. AES Pre-print 5259, presented at the 109th Convention.

It was written by DTS themselves and explains, in a nutshell, that a DTS 96/24 encoder splits the incoming data into two halves; one half contains the legacy backward compatible core data, whereas the other carries the extension data. In a 96/24 decoder, the 48kHz portion of the signal is upsampled to 96kHz, then combined with the true 96kHz element.

The entire audible frequency range, 20Hz - 24kHz, is carried by the core encoder, but the available data is split between the two encoder halves. In a regular 48kHz DTS system the 20Hz - 24kHz range is delivered at 1,536kb/s, in a DTS 96/24 system that same area of the spectrum is delivered at 1,152kb/s since 384kb/s is dedicated to the utterly pointless, inaudible extension data.

As I said, read the document. If you think DTS 96/24 sounds better, then fine, but don't try to say it is superior to any other form of DTS, it isn't.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Signature Sound   [ Signature Sound Lounge ]


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.