In Reply to: RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? posted by antoneb on March 25, 2010 at 21:35:06:
Woah one thing I just noticed looking at the Steely DAN
Stereo 96kHz Mix
and the Surround 96kHz tracks
It looks to me like for the Stereo version they used the old Master Tape from the RedBook Master...
There is a lot of Content Filtered at 20kHz. You see a notch after 20k and a bunch of noise from about 25k on up.
That is not present on the surround tracks.
They need to be called on their Shenanigans.
Also Something interesting about a lot of the Surround mixes.
The Front L&R are a bit squashed (Limited and Maximized) The surrounds and centers are much more open no maximizing to be seen.
Why would they mix the fronts like that??
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - antoneb 22:48:54 03/25/10 (10)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - antoneb 22:03:42 05/08/10 (0)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - jimby 18:52:54 05/08/10 (6)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - antoneb 21:06:08 05/08/10 (0)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - antoneb 20:41:47 05/08/10 (4)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - SBax 23:16:58 05/22/10 (3)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - antoneb 01:46:56 05/24/10 (0)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - antoneb 02:00:41 05/23/10 (1)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - topferkelly@yahoo.com 02:41:57 08/07/10 (0)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - Feirstein 06:46:07 04/25/10 (1)
- RE: How many DVD-A have bad Mastering? - antoneb 10:56:15 04/25/10 (0)