Why not 3.0?

DVD-Audiobahn

New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why not 4.0 or 4.1? - mcp 13:14:14 01/31/03 (32)

Why not 3.0? - Max 04:19:05 02/02/03 (0)

Re: Why not 4.0 or 4.1? - Kelvin K 19:50:50 02/01/03 (2)

Re: Why not 4.0 or 4.1? - grsteve 17:03:57 02/04/03 (1)

Accuphase CX-260 - Kelvin K 19:41:28 02/04/03 (0)

Chesky likes 4.0; he like 6.0 even more! - ted_b 19:48:17 01/31/03 (0)

I also would like a 4.1 or 4.0 (a.k.a. quadraphonic) format. And EMI does too! - HiFi Connasewer 17:49:31 01/31/03 (1)

Philips/Pentatone likes 4.0, too. - Kal Rubinson 15:24:05 02/01/03 (0)

Agreed. Unfortunately the surround mixes tend to assume everyone has a decent center speaker.... - oscar 16:51:28 01/31/03 (0)

After listening to hundreds of Quadraphonic Rock records , and many modern Multichannel Rock ... - ZS KEKL 16:30:04 01/31/03 (3)

I agree, and as for classical . . . - Martin says 05:36:24 02/07/03 (0)

Alan Parsons vs Center Channel - sven_tosing 18:45:23 01/31/03 (1)

and that disc sounds great! nt - Duilawyer 09:57:19 02/01/03 (0)

i think the centre channel is important ... - Christine Tham 14:27:34 01/31/03 (14)

surround can be done just as well in 4.0, without the Center channel - High-end Dreamer 18:56:46 01/31/03 (0)

Re: i think the centre channel is important ... - Eric LeRouge 15:21:40 01/31/03 (12)

there's actually two itu recos - one for ht, and one for music - Christine Tham 17:53:17 01/31/03 (11)

Re: there's actually two itu recos - one for ht, and one for music - Eric LeRouge 13:48:29 02/01/03 (0)

Re: there's actually two itu recos - one for ht, and one for music - John Kotches 22:21:55 01/31/03 (9)

Re: there's actually two itu recos - one for ht, and one for music - John Kotches 13:17:42 02/02/03 (0)

how does this EQ actually work? - Christine Tham 14:25:23 02/01/03 (7)

Re: how does this EQ actually work? - John Kotches 15:11:44 02/02/03 (6)

sorry still don't understand ... - Christine Tham 18:21:19 02/02/03 (5)

Re: sorry still don't understand ... - John Kotches 22:37:54 02/02/03 (4)

well i was hoping you would actually provide details rather than simply repeating your post? - Christine Tham 14:57:57 02/03/03 (3)

Re: well i was hoping you would actually provide details rather than simply repeating your post? - John Kotches 20:23:49 02/03/03 (2)

ok - thanks - sounds a bit intrusive for my liking - Christine Tham 20:50:21 02/03/03 (1)

Re: ok - thanks - sounds a bit intrusive for my liking - John Kotches 21:30:32 02/03/03 (0)

Stand your speaker on end. - Jim Pearce 13:20:08 01/31/03 (4)

Some thoughts - Eric LeRouge 15:02:59 01/31/03 (0)

Re: Stand your speaker on end. - mcp 13:21:57 01/31/03 (2)

Re: Stand your speaker on end. - Jim Pearce 13:31:30 01/31/03 (1)

I guess I'm always paranoid - mcp 13:38:45 01/31/03 (0)

Follow Ups

Why not 3.0? - Max 04:19:05 02/02/03 (0)

68.43.62.64