so nothing. - evector - DVD-Audiobahn

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Separate DualDisc forum - please! - greguva 12:20:00 03/09/05 (74)

Maybe DualDisc/DVD-Audio Forum - Craig 13:34:17 03/10/05 (2)

Audiophile and indie DVD-Audio labels should remain loyal to DVD-Audio as DualDisc is seen at best as a Mid-Fi product. - Teresa 16:41:59 03/10/05 (1)

Re: Audiophile and indie DVD-Audio labels should remain loyal to DVD-Audio as DualDisc is seen at best as a Mid-Fi produ - Craig 22:57:23 03/11/05 (0)

Re: Separate DualDisc forum - please! - ct 09:57:45 03/10/05 (0)

the Trojan Horse theory.... - tunenut 09:48:07 03/10/05 (13)

Re: the Trojan Horse theory.... - joyzmantoyz 13:00:19 03/10/05 (12)

Yeah, but which would your kid prefer? - Dave Kingsland 14:24:16 03/10/05 (1)

Re: Yeah, but which would your kid prefer? - joyzmantoyz 19:25:17 03/10/05 (0)

Re: the Trojan Horse theory.... - tunenut 13:48:23 03/10/05 (9)

Re: " a rising tide lifts all boats " . Not your boat , Gilligan . Your beloved S.S. SACD Minnow ... has sunk . LOL nt - ZS KEKL 20:47:08 03/10/05 (6)

Has SACD sunk? Yes: into a new single-sided disc called...cd2cd! - jdaniel@jps.net 09:21:34 03/15/05 (1)

The SACD version is SA-CS2CD and I don't think currently it is a threat to DualDisc. - Teresa 11:52:02 03/16/05 (0)

Deluded DualDisc Cheerleader, your lifeboat is foundering... - racerguy 13:52:06 03/11/05 (0)

Remember, the SS Minnow washed up on a little Island called "indie labels" and lasted for 20 years. It's over: - jdaniel@jps.net 08:51:47 03/11/05 (0)

DualDisc is the Titanic - tunenut 20:51:09 03/10/05 (1)

no, according to Frank it's the "lifeboat" of DVD-A - Christine Tham 23:07:06 03/14/05 (0)

Tunenut have you heard Sara K.: No Cover and Chuck Mangione on Chesky? Video with 24 Bit 96kHz Audio - Teresa 16:51:38 03/10/05 (1)

no they would be a waste of money for me - tunenut 17:47:27 03/10/05 (0)

Respectfully Disagree - mkulfan 15:48:13 03/09/05 (9)

When it has a DVD-A side, then those titles can be talked about in the DVD-A forum. - Michi 17:47:42 03/09/05 (8)

Don't be silly, we've always talked about DADs and HDADs here (nt) - Dave Kingsland 18:32:15 03/09/05 (7)

And you feel that 48/16 + DolbyDigital, as long as its on a DVD, fall into that category? - Michi 22:17:13 03/09/05 (6)

Re: And you feel that 48/16 + DolbyDigital, as long as its on a DVD, fall into that category? - applejack 09:27:50 03/11/05 (3)

LOL, thanks that is really interesting - Dave55 17:26:31 03/12/05 (2)

I don't know why it would upset anyone - racerguy 21:13:33 03/12/05 (1)

I'm sorry - Dave55 09:52:51 03/13/05 (0)

That's The Point! - mkulfan 09:47:24 03/10/05 (1)

Re: That's The Point! P.S. - mkulfan 09:49:26 03/10/05 (0)

What else is there to talk about? - Dave Kingsland 15:46:32 03/09/05 (1)

I agree - racerguy 19:12:39 03/09/05 (0)

I agree - Dave55 12:33:04 03/09/05 (43)

I agree for a seperate forum as well! While not DVD-Audio, 24/96 DADs are high resolution and should be allowed. (nt) - Teresa 14:02:52 03/09/05 (42)

How about a forum just for you Teresa? - give up 17:07:14 03/10/05 (0)

Well for consistency if 24/96 DADs are not DVD-Audio then they should be excluded too! - Dave55 14:18:08 03/09/05 (40)

But they are hi-rez PCM nt - theaudiohiffle 15:30:43 03/09/05 (39)

Maybe im a bit overboard - Dave55 16:02:45 03/09/05 (38)

On average, DADs are higher resolution than DVD-As (nt) - Dave Kingsland 18:31:35 03/09/05 (37)

Re: Interesting - Dave55 19:02:50 03/09/05 (36)

It's because only "audiophile" companies make DADs (nt) - racerguy 19:13:45 03/09/05 (35)

wrong - evector 21:56:42 03/10/05 (33)

other 24/96 DADs have come from Arts Music, Chesky, Analogue Productions, Water Lily. Also ... - Teresa 06:10:51 03/11/05 (4)

DAD is not a format - evector 08:33:24 03/11/05 (3)

Good point. - Dave55 18:38:36 03/11/05 (0)

Yes that is the technically correct. However the accepted nickname is "DAD" - Teresa 11:24:02 03/11/05 (1)

Re: Yes that is the technically correct. However the accepted nickname is "DAD" - evector 17:41:52 03/11/05 (0)

Classic Records is an "audiophile" company (nt) - racerguy 05:49:45 03/11/05 (27)

you bet. but no other "audiophile" company makes/markets DADs. DAD is not a format. - evector 08:58:59 03/11/05 (26)

So what? - racerguy 12:17:45 03/11/05 (3)

so nothing. - evector 17:44:05 03/11/05 (2)

So anyway - racerguy 18:01:29 03/11/05 (1)

Re: So anyway - evector 18:33:09 03/11/05 (0)

"DAD" is the accepted nickname for 2ch Linear 24/96 PCM DVD using the Video spec usually with no video. - Teresa 11:29:16 03/11/05 (21)

Re: "DAD" is the accepted nickname for 2ch Linear 24/96 PCM DVD using the Video spec usually with no video. - evector 18:00:43 03/11/05 (20)

So what name would you like for 24/96 DVDs? You did know DAD (=) Digital Audio Disc? and ... - Teresa 19:41:50 03/11/05 (18)

Re: So what name would you like for 24/96 DVDs? You did know DAD (=) Digital Audio Disc? and ... - NotMe 10:12:33 03/12/05 (6)

Classic's designation is perfect 24/96 DAD's and I just checked they did not trademark DAD so every one can use it. - Teresa 13:01:08 03/12/05 (4)

Re: Classic's designation is perfect 24/96 DAD's and I just checked they did not trademark DAD so every one can use it. - NotMe 10:18:14 03/13/05 (0)

Re: Classic's designation is perfect 24/96 DAD's and I just checked they did not trademark DAD so every one can use it. - evector 15:54:24 03/12/05 (2)

Do you own any Classic 24/96 DAD's? - Teresa 16:27:53 03/12/05 (1)

Re: Do you own any Classic 24/96 DAD's? - NotMe 10:21:05 03/13/05 (0)

Or just DVD - Dave55 10:28:56 03/12/05 (0)

I did a goole search for DAD - Dave55 09:32:47 03/12/05 (10)

I did a google search for 24/96 DAD and look what I found: an aritcle on the premier of the new DAD format: - Teresa 16:48:06 03/12/05 (2)

Re: It's Still Wrong - NotMe 21:57:34 03/13/05 (1)

DAD was and never is a format. It's a completely invented trade-name to describe the releases from a small number of - labels using an existing technology Dave55 15:37:44 03/14/05 (0)

Even music direct lists it as "DVD" - Dave55 10:24:28 03/12/05 (6)

Check out Elusive Disc's web site: under music All Formats - Teresa 13:16:58 03/12/05 (5)

Re: Here is Elusive Disc's discription of Townshend as DVD - Dave55 18:02:35 03/12/05 (0)

Teresa I am not trying to argue with you btw - Dave55 13:39:28 03/12/05 (3)

There is nothing to argue about 24/96 DADs are what they are: here is a google seach that may help you: 24/96 DAD - Teresa 13:50:04 03/12/05 (2)

Re: Try The DVD FAQ - NotMe 21:59:11 03/13/05 (0)

Thanks...I did that search as you outlined - Dave55 17:08:21 03/12/05 (0)

Re:I have to agree with evector on this. - Dave55 18:27:32 03/11/05 (0)

Re: Thanks NT - Dave55 20:09:16 03/09/05 (0)

Follow Ups

so nothing. - evector 17:44:05 03/11/05 (2)

So anyway - racerguy 18:01:29 03/11/05 (1)

Re: So anyway - evector 18:33:09 03/11/05 (0)