In Reply to: You're right, Christine! posted by unaffiliated on February 28, 2005 at 15:32:15:
http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=hirez&n=188739&highlight=analog&r=&session=
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Have I damaged my new Universal player? - Placido 11:59:07 02/22/05 (78)
- Re: Have I damaged my new Universal player? - Mike Z 14:19:08 02/25/05 (0)
- Re: Have I damaged my new Universal player? - mkulfan 17:41:09 02/23/05 (0)
- Don't sell the DualDisc... - ducati 04:50:42 02/23/05 (70)
- Re: Don't sell the DualDisc... - Just curious why not? Especially since the authentic DVD-Audio is still in print. - Teresa 23:27:43 02/23/05 (69)
- The Shortfall - mkulfan 14:01:00 02/25/05 (2)
- Let's see - Teresa 23:32:56 02/25/05 (1)
- Re: Let's see - mkulfan 05:21:03 02/27/05 (0)
- Re: Don't sell the DualDisc... - Just curious why not? Especially since the authentic DVD-Audio is still in print. - Martin419 06:08:40 02/24/05 (62)
- Actually, Teresa is right - Warner did say that - racerguy 10:52:07 02/24/05 (61)
- How can that be the "end" of DVD-Audio . . . - Martin419 05:04:15 02/25/05 (60)
- I disagree and here is why: - Teresa 23:56:05 02/25/05 (52)
- Re: I disagree and here is why: - Bobo U2 03:09:48 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: I disagree and here is why: - racerguy 10:26:20 02/26/05 (49)
- most DVD-Audio's so far are from Analog masters - Teresa 13:14:10 02/26/05 (48)
- I think the point is that 6 channels 192/24 MLP compression ... - Metralla 21:37:46 02/26/05 (47)
- I'm not talking about DualDisc but an improve High Resolution only version of DVD-Audio - Teresa 03:26:10 02/27/05 (46)
- "DVD-Audio hasn't become mainstream because there is low resolution information on the DVD-Audio disc" - Metralla 09:31:56 02/27/05 (1)
- You don't think hearing Dolby Digital has turned people off of DVD-Audio? Really? - Teresa 15:16:52 02/27/05 (0)
- 192/24 is overkill - unaffiliated 08:23:35 02/27/05 (43)
- Totally untrue! Just listen to 24 Bit 196kHz software from Classic Records, Warner Bros. and others. - Teresa 15:20:50 02/27/05 (42)
- Totally Wrong! - unaffiliated 18:13:28 02/27/05 (41)
- It is you that is Totally Wrong. It is not about hearing beyond 48kHz it how many samples per second. - Teresa 20:59:36 02/27/05 (40)
- My God! I actually agree with Teresa - mkulfan 17:10:02 03/02/05 (0)
- Re: LOL - navman 14:32:16 02/28/05 (6)
- LOL! Evidently you don't know how digital and analog work, please refer to: Robert Harley's superb book: - Teresa 17:08:01 02/28/05 (5)
- Re: LOL! Wrong...about hearing - navman 17:27:46 02/28/05 (4)
- That is why I didn't use the "ms" symbol this time, I spelled it out long have - Teresa 17:45:23 02/28/05 (3)
- Re: BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT WRONG - navman 17:58:29 02/28/05 (1)
- So I was missing a "0" Which means are ear/brian system is not as fast as I remembered. - Teresa 18:14:29 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: That is why I didn't use the "ms" symbol this time, I spelled it out long have - navman 17:51:38 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: It is you that is Totally Wrong. It is not about hearing beyond 48kHz it how many samples per second. - unaffiliated 05:37:58 02/28/05 (31)
- Give it up. You will never be able to convince Teresa :-) - Christine Tham 12:34:21 02/28/05 (10)
- Christine this thread is about "unaffiliated" assertion that 48kHz has as much resolution as 192kHz - Teresa 17:29:27 02/28/05 (4)
- Re: Bawhahahahhaaw roflmao again and again - navman 17:44:53 02/28/05 (3)
- Navman THE ONLY thing this thread is about is that "unaffiliated" CLAIMS 48kHz is as much resolution as 192kHz - Teresa 18:04:42 02/28/05 (2)
- Re: Navman THE ONLY thing this thread is about is that "unaffiliated" CLAIMS 48kHz is as much resolution as 192kHz - navman 18:07:51 02/28/05 (1)
- Re: Also - navman 18:10:44 02/28/05 (0)
- You're right, Christine! - unaffiliated 15:32:15 02/28/05 (1)
- This? - navman 15:55:05 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: Dont we have any "experts" in digital music - navman 14:26:37 02/28/05 (2)
- Re: Dont we have any "experts" in digital music - unaffiliated 16:05:56 02/28/05 (1)
- Haha... yep. nt - navman 16:07:54 02/28/05 (0)
- PROVE IT WITH SOFTWARE, My evidence is the history of Digitally recorded music - Teresa 09:01:46 02/28/05 (19)
- A completely predictable response - unaffiliated 15:35:07 02/28/05 (18)
- You still didn't answer my question: Do you play the 192kHz or 96kHz side of a Classic Records DVD-Audio - Teresa 17:17:21 02/28/05 (17)
- Okay... - unaffiliated 18:18:50 02/28/05 (3)
- LOL! Love it .... :^) - High-end Dreamer 12:28:52 03/01/05 (0)
- all I'm asking for is 48kHz software that sounds as good as 192kHz and that will prove your stupid theories. - Teresa 18:37:13 02/28/05 (0)
- Bawhahahahahaw - navman 18:20:47 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: I understood unaffiliated as saying - navman 17:36:11 02/28/05 (12)
- If you go through this long line of posts you will see unaffiliated said all you need is 48kHz - Teresa 18:26:08 02/28/05 (11)
- Re: No he did not - navman 18:47:08 02/28/05 (10)
- Well you made me read the whole thread. It was in another thread and authored by Frank not unaffiliated. - Teresa 19:17:49 02/28/05 (8)
- Re: My point exactly - navman 19:45:05 02/28/05 (7)
- You actually have it backwards they are irratating me and making me angry. All I wanted was a better DVD-Audio - Teresa 22:28:54 02/28/05 (1)
- Re: You are attacked (ur word) well actually - navman 15:29:15 03/01/05 (0)
- Now do you understand why unaffiliated said - navman 19:47:02 02/28/05 (4)
- Ok unaffiliated I'm sorry I confused you with Frank. - Teresa 22:18:02 02/28/05 (3)
- Take a deep breath... - unaffiliated 04:40:55 03/01/05 (2)
- My reasoning is based on the sound quality of the various DVD-Audio software released so far. - Teresa 06:10:00 03/01/05 (1)
- Re:No one has told you what to enjoy - navman 06:55:36 03/01/05 (0)
- He said its not worth going beyond 96KHz - navman 18:48:20 02/28/05 (0)
- n.t. - Martin419 04:06:21 02/26/05 (0)
- Teresa was referring specifically to "traditional" DVD-Audio releases - racerguy 09:13:29 02/25/05 (2)
- The only "traditional" thing about DVD-Audio . . . - Martin419 10:37:52 02/25/05 (1)
- but it makes them hard to find mixed in with all those lousy CDs plus it's hard to tell if they have DVD-Audio on them - Teresa 00:00:05 02/26/05 (0)
- Note that... - Frank.. 06:05:30 02/25/05 (3)
- Wrong - racerguy 09:09:59 02/25/05 (2)
- I'm shure... - Frank.. 09:33:20 02/25/05 (1)
- It's 'sure' not 'shure' (nt) - paulcordingley 21:28:46 02/25/05 (0)
- I *like* the DualDisc! - ducati 04:21:50 02/24/05 (2)
- My authentic DVD-Audio has interviews with Mickey Hart and Bob Weir. - Teresa 22:02:19 02/24/05 (1)
- Re: My authentic DVD-Audio has interviews with Mickey Hart and Bob Weir. - mkulfan 15:15:54 02/27/05 (0)
- Get the DVD-Audio version of "American Beauty" - Rhino R9 74385 and sell the DualDisc on eBay - Teresa 22:48:56 02/22/05 (0)
- I dont think so - navman 18:00:59 02/22/05 (0)
- A Panasonic DV 59AVI? - Garnot 15:56:05 02/22/05 (1)
- Oops -- thanks -- I meant 'Pioneer'. (n/t) - Placido 17:47:40 02/22/05 (0)
- I doubt it. {n.t.} - Martin419 14:07:12 02/22/05 (0)
Follow Ups
- This? - navman 15:55:05 02/28/05 (0)
You can not post to an archived thread.
[Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2013, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Take5 ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

