|
DVD-Audiobahn New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players. |
|
|
|
DVD-Audiobahn New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players. |
|
In Reply to: Have I damaged my new Universal player? posted by Placido on February 22, 2005 at 11:59:07:
I am pretty sure all of the issues surrounding DualDisc concerns the cd layer. Since the dvd-audio layer offers both stereo and surround tracks there really is no reason to play the cd layer (other than curiousity) in your new dvd player.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Have I damaged my new Universal player? - Placido 11:59:07 02/22/05 (78)
- Re: Have I damaged my new Universal player? - Mike Z 14:19:08 02/25/05 (0)
- Re: Have I damaged my new Universal player? - mkulfan 17:41:09 02/23/05 (0)
- Don't sell the DualDisc... - ducati 04:50:42 02/23/05 (70)
- Re: Don't sell the DualDisc... - Just curious why not? Especially since the authentic DVD-Audio is still in print. - Teresa 23:27:43 02/23/05 (69)
- The Shortfall - mkulfan 14:01:00 02/25/05 (2)
- Let's see - Teresa 23:32:56 02/25/05 (1)
- Re: Let's see - mkulfan 05:21:03 02/27/05 (0)
- Re: Don't sell the DualDisc... - Just curious why not? Especially since the authentic DVD-Audio is still in print. - Martin419 06:08:40 02/24/05 (62)
- Actually, Teresa is right - Warner did say that - racerguy 10:52:07 02/24/05 (61)
- How can that be the "end" of DVD-Audio . . . - Martin419 05:04:15 02/25/05 (60)
- I disagree and here is why: - Teresa 23:56:05 02/25/05 (52)
- Re: I disagree and here is why: - Bobo U2 03:09:48 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: I disagree and here is why: - racerguy 10:26:20 02/26/05 (49)
- most DVD-Audio's so far are from Analog masters - Teresa 13:14:10 02/26/05 (48)
- I think the point is that 6 channels 192/24 MLP compression ... - Metralla 21:37:46 02/26/05 (47)
- I'm not talking about DualDisc but an improve High Resolution only version of DVD-Audio - Teresa 03:26:10 02/27/05 (46)
- "DVD-Audio hasn't become mainstream because there is low resolution information on the DVD-Audio disc" - Metralla 09:31:56 02/27/05 (1)
- You don't think hearing Dolby Digital has turned people off of DVD-Audio? Really? - Teresa 15:16:52 02/27/05 (0)
- 192/24 is overkill - unaffiliated 08:23:35 02/27/05 (43)
- Totally untrue! Just listen to 24 Bit 196kHz software from Classic Records, Warner Bros. and others. - Teresa 15:20:50 02/27/05 (42)
- Totally Wrong! - unaffiliated 18:13:28 02/27/05 (41)
- It is you that is Totally Wrong. It is not about hearing beyond 48kHz it how many samples per second. - Teresa 20:59:36 02/27/05 (40)
- My God! I actually agree with Teresa - mkulfan 17:10:02 03/02/05 (0)
- Re: LOL - navman 14:32:16 02/28/05 (6)
- LOL! Evidently you don't know how digital and analog work, please refer to: Robert Harley's superb book: - Teresa 17:08:01 02/28/05 (5)
- Re: LOL! Wrong...about hearing - navman 17:27:46 02/28/05 (4)
- That is why I didn't use the "ms" symbol this time, I spelled it out long have - Teresa 17:45:23 02/28/05 (3)
- Re: BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT WRONG - navman 17:58:29 02/28/05 (1)
- So I was missing a "0" Which means are ear/brian system is not as fast as I remembered. - Teresa 18:14:29 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: That is why I didn't use the "ms" symbol this time, I spelled it out long have - navman 17:51:38 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: It is you that is Totally Wrong. It is not about hearing beyond 48kHz it how many samples per second. - unaffiliated 05:37:58 02/28/05 (31)
- Give it up. You will never be able to convince Teresa :-) - Christine Tham 12:34:21 02/28/05 (10)
- Christine this thread is about "unaffiliated" assertion that 48kHz has as much resolution as 192kHz - Teresa 17:29:27 02/28/05 (4)
- Re: Bawhahahahhaaw roflmao again and again - navman 17:44:53 02/28/05 (3)
- Navman THE ONLY thing this thread is about is that "unaffiliated" CLAIMS 48kHz is as much resolution as 192kHz - Teresa 18:04:42 02/28/05 (2)
- Re: Navman THE ONLY thing this thread is about is that "unaffiliated" CLAIMS 48kHz is as much resolution as 192kHz - navman 18:07:51 02/28/05 (1)
- Re: Also - navman 18:10:44 02/28/05 (0)
- You're right, Christine! - unaffiliated 15:32:15 02/28/05 (1)
- This? - navman 15:55:05 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: Dont we have any "experts" in digital music - navman 14:26:37 02/28/05 (2)
- Re: Dont we have any "experts" in digital music - unaffiliated 16:05:56 02/28/05 (1)
- Haha... yep. nt - navman 16:07:54 02/28/05 (0)
- PROVE IT WITH SOFTWARE, My evidence is the history of Digitally recorded music - Teresa 09:01:46 02/28/05 (19)
- A completely predictable response - unaffiliated 15:35:07 02/28/05 (18)
- You still didn't answer my question: Do you play the 192kHz or 96kHz side of a Classic Records DVD-Audio - Teresa 17:17:21 02/28/05 (17)
- Okay... - unaffiliated 18:18:50 02/28/05 (3)
- LOL! Love it .... :^) - High-end Dreamer 12:28:52 03/01/05 (0)
- all I'm asking for is 48kHz software that sounds as good as 192kHz and that will prove your stupid theories. - Teresa 18:37:13 02/28/05 (0)
- Bawhahahahahaw - navman 18:20:47 02/28/05 (0)
- Re: I understood unaffiliated as saying - navman 17:36:11 02/28/05 (12)
- If you go through this long line of posts you will see unaffiliated said all you need is 48kHz - Teresa 18:26:08 02/28/05 (11)
- Re: No he did not - navman 18:47:08 02/28/05 (10)
- Well you made me read the whole thread. It was in another thread and authored by Frank not unaffiliated. - Teresa 19:17:49 02/28/05 (8)
- Re: My point exactly - navman 19:45:05 02/28/05 (7)
- You actually have it backwards they are irratating me and making me angry. All I wanted was a better DVD-Audio - Teresa 22:28:54 02/28/05 (1)
- Re: You are attacked (ur word) well actually - navman 15:29:15 03/01/05 (0)
- Now do you understand why unaffiliated said - navman 19:47:02 02/28/05 (4)
- Ok unaffiliated I'm sorry I confused you with Frank. - Teresa 22:18:02 02/28/05 (3)
- Take a deep breath... - unaffiliated 04:40:55 03/01/05 (2)
- My reasoning is based on the sound quality of the various DVD-Audio software released so far. - Teresa 06:10:00 03/01/05 (1)
- Re:No one has told you what to enjoy - navman 06:55:36 03/01/05 (0)
- He said its not worth going beyond 96KHz - navman 18:48:20 02/28/05 (0)
- n.t. - Martin419 04:06:21 02/26/05 (0)
- Teresa was referring specifically to "traditional" DVD-Audio releases - racerguy 09:13:29 02/25/05 (2)
- The only "traditional" thing about DVD-Audio . . . - Martin419 10:37:52 02/25/05 (1)
- but it makes them hard to find mixed in with all those lousy CDs plus it's hard to tell if they have DVD-Audio on them - Teresa 00:00:05 02/26/05 (0)
- Note that... - Frank.. 06:05:30 02/25/05 (3)
- Wrong - racerguy 09:09:59 02/25/05 (2)
- I'm shure... - Frank.. 09:33:20 02/25/05 (1)
- It's 'sure' not 'shure' (nt) - paulcordingley 21:28:46 02/25/05 (0)
- I *like* the DualDisc! - ducati 04:21:50 02/24/05 (2)
- My authentic DVD-Audio has interviews with Mickey Hart and Bob Weir. - Teresa 22:02:19 02/24/05 (1)
- Re: My authentic DVD-Audio has interviews with Mickey Hart and Bob Weir. - mkulfan 15:15:54 02/27/05 (0)
- Get the DVD-Audio version of "American Beauty" - Rhino R9 74385 and sell the DualDisc on eBay - Teresa 22:48:56 02/22/05 (0)
- I dont think so - navman 18:00:59 02/22/05 (0)
- A Panasonic DV 59AVI? - Garnot 15:56:05 02/22/05 (1)
- Oops -- thanks -- I meant 'Pioneer'. (n/t) - Placido 17:47:40 02/22/05 (0)
- I doubt it. {n.t.} - Martin419 14:07:12 02/22/05 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: Have I damaged my new Universal player? - mkulfan 17:41:09 02/23/05 (0)
You can not post to an archived thread.
[Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2013, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Take5 ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]
