In Reply to: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice posted by Jay Buridan on November 7, 2016 at 14:46:05:
And without blind testing there is a high probability of circular reasoning. And I'm saying this as someone who does do non-blind testing and makes decisions based on non-blind listening.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice - hahax@verizon.net 19:59:34 11/07/16 (5)
- Please elaborate on circular reasoning - Jay Buridan 21:17:33 11/07/16 (4)
- I know it's real because I hear it. I know I hear it because it's real - Analog Scott 13:49:05 11/19/16 (0)
- RE: Please elaborate on circular reasoning - hahax@verizon.net 05:21:11 11/08/16 (2)
- I know what circular reasoning is - Jay Buridan 19:23:31 11/19/16 (0)
- Found it - Jay Buridan 19:18:28 11/19/16 (0)