|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: On the blurriness of MQA posted by Dave_K on November 2, 2016 at 12:38:32:
It seems many have ideological objections to a proprietary encoding format. Fair enough, but please don't second guess the technical aspects to justify the objection. That way madness lies. Bob Stuart's paper shows that the end-to-end dispersion of a 192kHz linear phase system is much more than MQA.
Interesting that MP3 is brought up in this thread. I think of them as similar, in broad terms: MP3 analyses the signal and throws away signal in as harmless a way as possible to fit a given data rate, MQA analyses the signal and throws away only unoccupied dynamic range to reduce the bit-rate. Of course, I might be wrong, but I like that analogy.
Regards
13DoW
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Guys, pleeeze... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 18:46:13 11/02/16 (3)
- I'll stick to the technical points then - Dave_K 08:57:34 11/03/16 (2)
- RE: I'll stick to the technical points then - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 15:07:29 11/03/16 (1)
- RE: I'll stick to the technical points then - Dave_K 12:30:14 11/08/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
