In Reply to: RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels posted by Jim Austin on October 29, 2016 at 11:26:56:
Hi,
I think there are many reasons to go at it in a big way.
1) Analog tape certainly doesn't last forever. So archival.
2) You'll get economies of scale by doing so (i.e., processing many instead of few).
3) Chances are they will use it and it will simply be a right-click away on a hard drive.
These companies know that streaming via digital files is the future, so I'd assume simple preparedness.
Doug Schneider
SoundStage!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Many reasons... - Doug Schneider 13:49:24 10/29/16 (19)
- RE: Many reasons... - Jim Austin 13:58:40 10/29/16 (15)
- RE: Many reasons... - Doug Schneider 14:12:03 10/29/16 (13)
- So in other words ... - Jim Austin 14:22:01 10/29/16 (4)
- RE: So in other words ... - PAR 16:06:39 10/29/16 (3)
- RE: So in other words ... - ahendler 18:21:11 10/29/16 (2)
- RE: So in other words ... - PAR 01:19:43 10/30/16 (1)
- owned by Naxos - fmak 08:44:41 10/30/16 (0)
- RE: Many reasons... - Jim Austin 14:19:43 10/29/16 (7)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - fmak 08:41:05 10/30/16 (5)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Jim Austin 09:11:08 10/30/16 (4)
- MQA process appears to be accelerating the pace of digitizing analog tapes - fmak 12:49:47 10/30/16 (0)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Isaak J. Garvey 09:35:17 10/30/16 (2)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Jim Austin 09:56:03 10/30/16 (1)
- RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Isaak J. Garvey 12:23:46 10/30/16 (0)
- RE: Many reasons... - Doug Schneider 14:26:37 10/29/16 (0)
- RE: Many reasons... - Isaak J. Garvey 14:10:16 10/29/16 (0)
- RE: Many reasons... - ahendler 13:54:03 10/29/16 (2)
- RE: Many reasons... - Jim Austin 14:02:53 10/29/16 (0)
- RE: Many reasons... - Doug Schneider 13:56:53 10/29/16 (0)