In Reply to: RE: Will some of you guys PLEASE "yIn Suq"??? posted by Isaak J. Garvey on February 2, 2016 at 10:37:34:
Would it have really been that different had it appeared in a paid ad? Seems to me the item was newsworthy enough to print.
I'm only interested in the substance. I've been following this on Waldrep's web site since the beginning. Waldrep seems surprised, bewildered, even bothered by all the attention it's getting. I'm always interested to see how people deal with problems I wouldn't know where to begin tackling. There are a lot of those out there. Will this die out and interest in it fade quickly? That's my hunch, this is hardly world shattering news to some of us. Or will it just drone on interminably? Seems to me it's going to grow rather old fast. AQ has some internal problems to sort out. Usually that's time for a re-org and maybe one or two heads rolling. The only thing unusual from my point of view was how obvious and blatant it was. Usually it's more subtle.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- What if Low had taken out a full page ad to publish his letter? - MarkJohns 13:26:36 02/02/16 (4)
- RE: What if Low had taken out a full page ad to publish his letter? - Isaak J. Garvey 14:59:40 02/02/16 (3)
- RE: What if Low had taken out a full page ad to publish his letter? - MarkJohns 16:13:14 02/02/16 (2)
- RE: What if Low had taken out a full page ad to publish his letter? - Isaak J. Garvey 16:25:09 02/02/16 (1)
- RE: What if Low had taken out a full page ad to publish his letter? - MarkJohns 18:25:07 02/02/16 (0)