Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: The larger issue, IMNSHO... posted by John Atkinson on February 2, 2016 at 12:48:19:
Can you think of any other reason he might have sent the editor of a magazine an 'open letter'?
Serious question. Were you even aware of the fuss over the video before you read his letter?
Was ANYONE?
Call me uninformed, by I'd never heard of Mark Waldrep or Real HD-Audio before reading this thread.
Tempest in a teapot until it makes the pages of Steriophile (on line)?
Audioquest better off had you chosen NOT to publish their 'open letter'?
Ironic, especially in view of all of the criticism that's been heaped on you for giving them the 'platform'.
First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 10:47:07 01/29/16 (95)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - FSonicSmith 07:02:47 02/01/16 (1)
- The only 'lawyerable' claim would seem to be AQ's... - Ivan303 07:13:20 02/01/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - RGA 16:11:46 01/31/16 (1)
- No. The video of interest has been taken down for the time being. (nt) - Steve O 17:11:42 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - b.l.zeebub 15:11:49 01/31/16 (5)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 15:39:48 01/31/16 (4)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - The Dill 16:32:54 01/31/16 (2)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 16:41:01 01/31/16 (1)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - The Dill 16:51:01 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - A.Wayne 15:53:58 01/31/16 (0)
- Translation of Low's letter: - Ross 12:22:10 01/31/16 (34)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - Isaak J. Garvey 14:40:36 01/31/16 (25)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - faskenite 14:57:32 01/31/16 (24)
- You got that right. - Dave Pogue 07:23:13 02/01/16 (13)
- Not at all.... - Ivan303 08:25:15 02/02/16 (12)
- "So WTF do I care" - Dave Pogue 09:18:44 02/02/16 (11)
- The larger issue, IMNSHO... - Ivan303 11:38:16 02/02/16 (10)
- RE: The larger issue, IMNSHO... - John Atkinson 12:48:19 02/02/16 (7)
- RE: The larger issue, IMNSHO... - johns dad 14:22:36 02/02/16 (0)
- Interesting.... - Ivan303 13:03:18 02/02/16 (1)
- CORRECTION: I do know Mark Waldrep.... - Ivan303 17:37:05 02/02/16 (0)
- RE: The larger issue, IMNSHO... - A.Wayne 12:49:08 02/02/16 (3)
- RE: The larger issue, IMNSHO... - johns dad 14:23:58 02/02/16 (0)
- RE: The larger issue, IMNSHO... - Isaak J. Garvey 13:07:11 02/02/16 (1)
- RE: The larger issue, IMNSHO... Somewhere there's a minature Violin playing - A.Wayne 14:24:36 02/02/16 (0)
- Good to know there's a larger issue - Dave Pogue 12:42:48 02/02/16 (1)
- RE: "Get a life," - Ivan303 13:05:50 02/02/16 (0)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - Isaak J. Garvey 15:34:29 01/31/16 (9)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - faskenite 16:46:25 02/01/16 (8)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - johns dad 06:32:05 02/02/16 (2)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - Isaak J. Garvey 07:37:41 02/02/16 (1)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: HELP ...!!!! - A.Wayne 10:02:45 02/02/16 (0)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - Isaak J. Garvey 16:54:04 02/01/16 (4)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - faskenite 16:57:41 02/01/16 (3)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - faskenite 18:30:00 02/01/16 (0)
- Calling someone a 'nitwit'... - Ivan303 17:43:19 02/01/16 (0)
- RE: Translation of Low's letter: - Isaak J. Garvey 17:05:19 02/01/16 (0)
- It's merely the... - mkuller 14:14:59 01/31/16 (0)
- Well said (nt) - 4everyoung 14:10:25 01/31/16 (0)
- Has anyone thought of making a movie out of this? Fascinating stuff. ;-). Nt - geoffkait 13:34:46 01/31/16 (4)
- Soap opera - As the Cable Burns. nt - DAP 06:55:01 02/02/16 (0)
- RE: Has anyone thought of making a movie out of this? Fascinating stuff. ;-). Nt - mlee 17:18:43 01/31/16 (1)
- RE: Has anyone thought of making a movie out of this? Fascinating stuff. ;-). Nt - Isaak J. Garvey 17:28:06 01/31/16 (0)
- A series... - musetap 14:42:53 01/31/16 (0)
- Maybe SP's involvement has an ulterior motive ... - bjh 12:57:29 01/31/16 (0)
- And yet there is no denial in the Audioquest letter regarding Mark Waldrep's claim... - Ivan303 13:26:43 01/30/16 (6)
- RE: And yet there is no denial in the Audioquest letter regarding Mark Waldrep's claim... - MarkJohns 06:42:03 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: And yet there is no denial in the Audioquest letter regarding Mark Waldrep's claim... - Isaak J. Garvey 15:52:33 01/30/16 (0)
- RE: And yet there is no denial in the Audioquest letter regarding Mark Waldrep's claim... - MarkJohns 14:23:15 01/30/16 (3)
- RE: And yet there is no denial in the Audioquest letter regarding Mark Waldrep's claim... - A.Wayne 14:50:45 01/30/16 (2)
- RE: And yet there is no denial in the Audioquest letter regarding Mark Waldrep's claim... - 4everyoung 16:09:42 01/30/16 (1)
- RE: And yet there is no denial in the Audioquest letter regarding Mark Waldrep's claim... - A.Wayne 16:16:22 01/30/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - MarkJohns 08:03:05 01/30/16 (0)
- Why aren't people talking about the content of the letter... - John N 06:59:58 01/30/16 (4)
- "They then act like offended parties." - Rick W 09:17:15 01/30/16 (2)
- RE: "They then act like offended parties." - A.Wayne 09:57:11 01/30/16 (1)
- RE: "They then act like offended parties." - Rick W 11:12:27 01/30/16 (0)
- RE: Why aren't people talking about the content of the letter... - Isaak J. Garvey 08:26:16 01/30/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Bill the K 19:22:30 01/29/16 (1)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:24:19 01/30/16 (0)
- I don't see the problem - Gary 15:32:10 01/29/16 (8)
- RE: I don't see the problem - Isaak J. Garvey 15:53:37 01/29/16 (7)
- RE: I don't see the problem - A.Wayne 17:54:47 01/29/16 (1)
- RE: I don't see the problem - Isaak J. Garvey 18:06:23 01/29/16 (0)
- RE: I don't see the problem - Gary 16:17:05 01/29/16 (4)
- RE: I don't see the problem - johns dad 16:38:48 01/29/16 (3)
- RE: I don't see the problem - The Dill 17:54:52 01/29/16 (2)
- RE: I don't see the problem - johns dad 18:48:23 01/29/16 (0)
- Exactly NT - lancelot 18:48:06 01/29/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 12:20:16 01/29/16 (22)
- I continue to be astonished by the amount of utter crap - Analog Scott 06:52:56 02/01/16 (0)
- Perhaps it would have been more appropriate to have reprinted Mark Waldrep's blog nt - DAP 13:48:05 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 07:41:55 01/31/16 (14)
- Thanks for the link, John - Rod M 08:37:02 01/31/16 (1)
- RE: Thanks for the link, John - John Atkinson 08:53:10 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:01:10 01/31/16 (11)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Jeffrey Lee 10:27:46 02/01/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 08:31:01 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Rod M 08:11:36 01/31/16 (8)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:16:20 01/31/16 (7)
- Seems to me that JA/S'phile is giving us a view of both sides. - Rick W 08:34:23 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Rod M 08:26:24 01/31/16 (5)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:31:48 01/31/16 (4)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 08:35:57 01/31/16 (3)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:39:26 01/31/16 (2)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 07:31:19 02/01/16 (1)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - A.Wayne 07:38:07 02/01/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - MarkJohns 14:00:44 01/29/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 12:42:19 01/29/16 (2)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - BubbaMike 17:16:03 02/01/16 (1)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 17:25:50 02/01/16 (0)
- Sometimes the appearance of impropriety can be damning. - viridian 12:36:28 01/29/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - johns dad 11:49:57 01/29/16 (2)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 12:08:40 01/29/16 (1)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - johns dad 12:59:20 01/29/16 (0)
Follow Ups
- Interesting.... - Ivan303 13:03:18 02/02/16 (1)
- CORRECTION: I do know Mark Waldrep.... - Ivan303 17:37:05 02/02/16 (0)