In Reply to: RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? posted by Isaak J. Garvey on January 31, 2016 at 08:01:10:
Excuse me, but I'm getting totally confused with the issue here. News is news, whether it's good or bad. If anything, publishing the 'Open Letter' exposes the video to scrutiny more than it gives AQ cover. Perhaps other outlets ignored publication because they wanted to give AQ cover or just didn't want to get into the fray. You'd have to ask them about it.
It seems to me that this discussion should be about AQ, not JA.
-Rod
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Rod M 08:11:36 01/31/16 (8)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:16:20 01/31/16 (7)
- Seems to me that JA/S'phile is giving us a view of both sides. - Rick W 08:34:23 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Rod M 08:26:24 01/31/16 (5)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:31:48 01/31/16 (4)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 08:35:57 01/31/16 (3)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:39:26 01/31/16 (2)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 07:31:19 02/01/16 (1)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - A.Wayne 07:38:07 02/01/16 (0)