In Reply to: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? posted by Isaak J. Garvey on January 29, 2016 at 10:47:07:
>Why was Audioquest given a venue to write a "letter to the community" on
>Stereophile's website?
AudioQuest sent this open letter to pretty much every audio editor and
writer yesterday evening and also posted it to Facebook. I thought it
sufficiently newsworthy to be worth reprinting on the Stereophile website,
so I asked Mr. Low for permission to do so.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 12:20:16 01/29/16 (22)
- I continue to be astonished by the amount of utter crap - Analog Scott 06:52:56 02/01/16 (0)
- Perhaps it would have been more appropriate to have reprinted Mark Waldrep's blog nt - DAP 13:48:05 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 07:41:55 01/31/16 (14)
- Thanks for the link, John - Rod M 08:37:02 01/31/16 (1)
- RE: Thanks for the link, John - John Atkinson 08:53:10 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:01:10 01/31/16 (11)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Jeffrey Lee 10:27:46 02/01/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 08:31:01 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Rod M 08:11:36 01/31/16 (8)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:16:20 01/31/16 (7)
- Seems to me that JA/S'phile is giving us a view of both sides. - Rick W 08:34:23 01/31/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Rod M 08:26:24 01/31/16 (5)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:31:48 01/31/16 (4)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 08:35:57 01/31/16 (3)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 08:39:26 01/31/16 (2)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - John Atkinson 07:31:19 02/01/16 (1)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - A.Wayne 07:38:07 02/01/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - MarkJohns 14:00:44 01/29/16 (0)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 12:42:19 01/29/16 (2)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - BubbaMike 17:16:03 02/01/16 (1)
- RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? - Isaak J. Garvey 17:25:50 02/01/16 (0)
- Sometimes the appearance of impropriety can be damning. - viridian 12:36:28 01/29/16 (0)