In Reply to: Shared Delusions... posted by regmac on October 26, 2015 at 07:55:29:
"When it comes to the subjective camp I wonder how much brand/price bias figures into the evaluation process?"
I wonder too. It certainly figures in, the Harman research shows that. But I have no idea to what degree its affecting a given review, or my own impressions.
"It seems to me that when subjectivists insist on sighted testing what they are really after is brand/price identification/knowledge. Once they are given that information then they are on firm footing. Oftentimes, if an audiophile thinks he is evaluating a $500 amp the exercise becomes a yawner. But if he believes he is auditioning a $25,000 amp...."
But who insists on that? I think that the issue with blind testing usually has more to do with practical logistics. Side-by-side double blind AB tests are hard to arrange.
"Hanni points to a study (link below). According to Stanford researchers, when a person is told they are comparing a $5 wine with a $45 wine, when they are, in fact, sampling the same wine, the part of the brain that experiences pleasure will become more active when the drinker believes he is tasting the $45 wine.
"I suspect further research will demonstrate the same holds true for evaluations of high-end audio and other luxury goods."
I wouldn't be at all surprised. And, really, is there anything wrong with that, if your goal is to feel good? The issue that I have is that it makes it harder to put together a really good *sounding* system.
Personally, I try to find those few magical components that punch way above their price class.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Shared Delusions... - josh358 09:09:25 10/26/15 (2)
- RE: Shared Delusions... - regmac 09:18:58 10/26/15 (1)
- RE: Shared Delusions... - josh358 09:58:37 10/26/15 (0)