In Reply to: RE: Folks seem to have forgotten how the publishing business works... posted by John Atkinson on September 4, 2015 at 04:20:02:
but your reading skills don't quite measure up.
At no point did I share an opinion on how you view your "responsibilities as magazine editor", and for an obvious reason. I have no way of knowing.
Here's hoping your publisher didn't threaten to take the lost revenue from those two angry advertisers out of your pay.
Link below:
First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - Ivan303 07:12:29 09/04/15 (9)
- RE: You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - John Atkinson 08:00:47 09/04/15 (8)
- RE: John Crabbe - goldenthal 14:45:52 09/10/15 (0)
- RE: You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - JTimothyA 07:01:31 09/08/15 (0)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - Ivan303 08:55:30 09/04/15 (5)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - Charles Hansen 11:58:19 09/04/15 (4)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - fmak 00:19:09 09/05/15 (1)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - jamesgarvin 12:42:32 09/08/15 (0)
- I have no reason to doubt that.... - Ivan303 13:06:07 09/04/15 (1)
- I would suggest that... - Bill Leebens 15:24:21 09/16/15 (0)