In Reply to: RE: Stereophile now cancelled posted by mark.korda@myfairpoint.net on September 3, 2015 at 13:55:20:
The EDITOR works for the PUBLISHER, not the other way 'round. The PUBLISHER hires and fires the folks in charge of circulation.Which is why all of this nonsense we keep hearing about the 'Chinese Wall' between the editorial side and the advertising side in publishing is so silly.
When the managing editor of the New York Times can be given the boot, in part due to disagreements with the paper's chief executive over 'native advertising', it suddenly becomes obvious how this particular sausage is made.
As print media goes into its final death throes I'm sure things will get even worse.
A local newspaper here in San Francisco just did an editorial house-cleaning over a less-than-complementary piece on an Indian Casino forgetting that the Indian Casino in questions spent about 20K-40K a year on advertising. Editors were given the choice by the publisher of making up the losses out of their pay or writing a major 'fluff' piece in an attempt to woo back the advertiser.
Chinese Wall indeed!
First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass
Edits: 09/03/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Folks seem to have forgotten how the publishing business works... - Ivan303 18:20:29 09/03/15 (21)
- RE: Folks seem to have forgotten how the publishing business works... - John Atkinson 04:20:02 09/04/15 (15)
- John... - hifitommy 12:15:46 09/05/15 (4)
- RE: John... - John Atkinson 07:16:16 09/06/15 (2)
- RE: John...You should not try to change the subject about your review policy - fmak 22:50:24 09/08/15 (1)
- RE: John...You should not try to change the subject about your review policy - John Atkinson 08:14:45 09/09/15 (0)
- RE: John...seconded [n.t.a.] - wangmr 22:33:25 09/05/15 (0)
- You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - Ivan303 07:12:29 09/04/15 (9)
- RE: You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - John Atkinson 08:00:47 09/04/15 (8)
- RE: John Crabbe - goldenthal 14:45:52 09/10/15 (0)
- RE: You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - JTimothyA 07:01:31 09/08/15 (0)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - Ivan303 08:55:30 09/04/15 (5)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - Charles Hansen 11:58:19 09/04/15 (4)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - fmak 00:19:09 09/05/15 (1)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - jamesgarvin 12:42:32 09/08/15 (0)
- I have no reason to doubt that.... - Ivan303 13:06:07 09/04/15 (1)
- I would suggest that... - Bill Leebens 15:24:21 09/16/15 (0)
- Yes, sir....... - Winston Smith 23:02:00 09/03/15 (4)
- Don't forget that purveyor of fair and balanced reporting, FOX - DFaulds 04:35:46 09/09/15 (1)
- Faux News is part of Newscorp. (Nt.) - Winston Smith 15:27:18 09/09/15 (0)
- Here is a great website to get real information - Charles Hansen 12:12:28 09/04/15 (1)
- Charles,..... - Winston Smith 13:21:41 09/05/15 (0)