In Reply to: RE: Stereophile now cancelled posted by Shane from AUS on September 3, 2015 at 12:03:56:
Hi Shane, from down under this is Mark from up over. I'm with you brother! It's not the cost of the subscription it's the integrity of the company. Hey John Atkinson, stop putting the blame of irate subscribers out of your hands and on the distributor. If your in charge make a move to improve or get someone else to put a Stereophile in the mailbox. If I ran the zoo heads would roll on this issue of issues! Shane, I had bills for re-subscription twice a month all year long and I was getting pissed. I had a little problem with Absolute Sound's subscription a while back. A few days later I got a mysterious manila envelope with 3 separate issues of their magazine and a personal I'm sorry note from Robert Hartley, the head man. Maybe Stereophile should hire Donald Trump although he might be preoccupied right now. I still love Stereophile even though a lot is over my head, but it's not rocket science to get it delivered and charged fairly for a copy....Mark Korda
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Stereophile now cancelled - mark.korda@myfairpoint.net 13:55:20 09/03/15 (30)
- Folks seem to have forgotten how the publishing business works... - Ivan303 18:20:29 09/03/15 (21)
- RE: Folks seem to have forgotten how the publishing business works... - John Atkinson 04:20:02 09/04/15 (15)
- John... - hifitommy 12:15:46 09/05/15 (4)
- RE: John... - John Atkinson 07:16:16 09/06/15 (2)
- RE: John...You should not try to change the subject about your review policy - fmak 22:50:24 09/08/15 (1)
- RE: John...You should not try to change the subject about your review policy - John Atkinson 08:14:45 09/09/15 (0)
- RE: John...seconded [n.t.a.] - wangmr 22:33:25 09/05/15 (0)
- You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - Ivan303 07:12:29 09/04/15 (9)
- RE: You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - John Atkinson 08:00:47 09/04/15 (8)
- RE: John Crabbe - goldenthal 14:45:52 09/10/15 (0)
- RE: You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - JTimothyA 07:01:31 09/08/15 (0)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - Ivan303 08:55:30 09/04/15 (5)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - Charles Hansen 11:58:19 09/04/15 (4)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - fmak 00:19:09 09/05/15 (1)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - jamesgarvin 12:42:32 09/08/15 (0)
- I have no reason to doubt that.... - Ivan303 13:06:07 09/04/15 (1)
- I would suggest that... - Bill Leebens 15:24:21 09/16/15 (0)
- Yes, sir....... - Winston Smith 23:02:00 09/03/15 (4)
- Don't forget that purveyor of fair and balanced reporting, FOX - DFaulds 04:35:46 09/09/15 (1)
- Faux News is part of Newscorp. (Nt.) - Winston Smith 15:27:18 09/09/15 (0)
- Here is a great website to get real information - Charles Hansen 12:12:28 09/04/15 (1)
- Charles,..... - Winston Smith 13:21:41 09/05/15 (0)
- RE: Stereophile now cancelled - John Atkinson 15:58:23 09/03/15 (7)
- The Right Way - fmak 23:04:06 09/03/15 (6)
- COmmon Practice - John Atkinson 04:10:36 09/04/15 (5)
- RE: COmmon Practice? - fmak 08:04:33 09/04/15 (4)
- RE: Common Practice? - John Atkinson 08:27:38 09/04/15 (3)
- RE: Common Practice? - fmak 09:13:39 09/04/15 (2)
- RE: Common Practice? - PAR 15:45:03 09/04/15 (1)
- RE: Common Practice?So - fmak 00:14:19 09/05/15 (0)