In Reply to: Stereophile automatic renewal Scam posted by Shane from AUS on September 3, 2015 at 05:50:28:
Guys, it is not the cost ( $76 not $12) or ruining my credit that has been the concern.
It is the automatic renewal and charge to my credit card, as I did not agree to any automatic renewal as I never do. I did not forget complying with this BS clause. The company did this without my permission.
It is this unethical behaviour that has made my mind up to cancel my Sterophile subscription.I probably would have just renewed if they sent me a normal renewal notice. I am not the only international subscriber with these thoughts.
I have phoned up the company and cancelled my Sterophile subscription. No cancellations number or anything, I just have to trust them that it gets done and the credit card charge is reversed.I would suggest if JA is reading this to stop his subscription company doing this.
Edits: 09/03/15 09/03/15 09/03/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Stereophile now cancelled - Shane from AUS 12:03:56 09/03/15 (33)
- RE: Stereophile now cancelled - Bill the K 19:51:10 09/03/15 (1)
- RE: Stereophile now cancelled - Shane from AUS 03:04:48 09/04/15 (0)
- RE: Stereophile now cancelled - mark.korda@myfairpoint.net 13:55:20 09/03/15 (30)
- Folks seem to have forgotten how the publishing business works... - Ivan303 18:20:29 09/03/15 (21)
- RE: Folks seem to have forgotten how the publishing business works... - John Atkinson 04:20:02 09/04/15 (15)
- John... - hifitommy 12:15:46 09/05/15 (4)
- RE: John... - John Atkinson 07:16:16 09/06/15 (2)
- RE: John...You should not try to change the subject about your review policy - fmak 22:50:24 09/08/15 (1)
- RE: John...You should not try to change the subject about your review policy - John Atkinson 08:14:45 09/09/15 (0)
- RE: John...seconded [n.t.a.] - wangmr 22:33:25 09/05/15 (0)
- You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - Ivan303 07:12:29 09/04/15 (9)
- RE: You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - John Atkinson 08:00:47 09/04/15 (8)
- RE: John Crabbe - goldenthal 14:45:52 09/10/15 (0)
- RE: You may well be a FANTASTIC editor... - JTimothyA 07:01:31 09/08/15 (0)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - Ivan303 08:55:30 09/04/15 (5)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - Charles Hansen 11:58:19 09/04/15 (4)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - fmak 00:19:09 09/05/15 (1)
- RE: "You gave an example of "pay-for-play" journalism in a thread about Stereophile, thus strongly implying... - jamesgarvin 12:42:32 09/08/15 (0)
- I have no reason to doubt that.... - Ivan303 13:06:07 09/04/15 (1)
- I would suggest that... - Bill Leebens 15:24:21 09/16/15 (0)
- Yes, sir....... - Winston Smith 23:02:00 09/03/15 (4)
- Don't forget that purveyor of fair and balanced reporting, FOX - DFaulds 04:35:46 09/09/15 (1)
- Faux News is part of Newscorp. (Nt.) - Winston Smith 15:27:18 09/09/15 (0)
- Here is a great website to get real information - Charles Hansen 12:12:28 09/04/15 (1)
- Charles,..... - Winston Smith 13:21:41 09/05/15 (0)
- RE: Stereophile now cancelled - John Atkinson 15:58:23 09/03/15 (7)
- The Right Way - fmak 23:04:06 09/03/15 (6)
- COmmon Practice - John Atkinson 04:10:36 09/04/15 (5)
- RE: COmmon Practice? - fmak 08:04:33 09/04/15 (4)
- RE: Common Practice? - John Atkinson 08:27:38 09/04/15 (3)
- RE: Common Practice? - fmak 09:13:39 09/04/15 (2)
- RE: Common Practice? - PAR 15:45:03 09/04/15 (1)
- RE: Common Practice?So - fmak 00:14:19 09/05/15 (0)