In Reply to: RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers posted by Peter Breuninger on August 19, 2015 at 13:36:22:
>To me it was preposterous to think that a microphone 6 to 12 inches from
>the front baffle of the loudspeaker and a computer program would correlate
>to what I hear in the listening room, let alone describe what the
>loudspeakers actually sound like to "me".
If you are referring the time I measured the Bozak Concert Grand speakers
at your home, Peter, I did measure the speaker's in-room sound (see fig.5
at the link below) in a grid centered on your listening position. This
type of measurement does correlate with a speaker's perceived tonal
balance.
Measurements taken with the microphone close to the radiator are termed
"nearfield" and are one way to assess a loudspeaker's low-frequency
behavior if you don't have access to an anechoic chamber. (See Don Keele's
classic 1973 AES paper on this technique.) A nearfield measurement is not
intended to give a result that describes how a loudspeaker sounds like
overall.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - John Atkinson 04:16:10 08/20/15 (8)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - MarkJohns 06:53:56 09/09/15 (1)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - MarkJohns 08:44:55 09/09/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - A.Wayne 05:28:02 08/20/15 (5)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - John Atkinson 07:27:00 08/23/15 (4)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - MarkJohns 07:41:15 09/09/15 (3)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers, ported vs sealed - A.Wayne 13:20:24 09/09/15 (2)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers, ported vs sealed - MarkJohns 14:59:44 09/09/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers, ported vs sealed - A.Wayne 13:48:23 09/09/15 (0)