In Reply to: RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers posted by hahax@verizon.net on August 18, 2015 at 20:38:52:
Hi,
You are correct in saying that measurements in the right hands. But the right measurements, and enough of them.
The real key to my article isn't that measurements can't be used at all to predict. Rather, what it says is that you must have sufficient measurements to predict, and that, in my opinion, no magazine produces nearly enough measurements to predict anything with great accuracy, including us. You also have to have the skill to do so, which few have.
Over to Dr. Toole. I have tremendous respect for him. At Harman, they do the necessary number of measurements to accurate predict (full sound power and more), which is incredibly time-consuming. They also have skilled engineers able to properly interpret them. So they've gone the extra mile . . . and then some.
A few charts in a magazine, though, won't tell you a great deal. That's my point.
Doug Schneider
SoundStage!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Doug Schneider 21:54:37 08/18/15 (43)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - hahax@verizon.net 04:59:00 08/19/15 (42)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - E-Stat 15:13:56 08/19/15 (12)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - rick_m 18:56:34 08/20/15 (11)
- And yet... - E-Stat 05:26:43 08/21/15 (8)
- RE: And yet... - rick_m 09:12:24 08/21/15 (7)
- RE: And yet... - josh358 16:23:37 08/27/15 (4)
- RE: And yet... - A.Wayne 07:43:04 08/28/15 (3)
- RE: And yet... - josh358 14:11:19 08/28/15 (2)
- RE: And yet...height is important when not fixed .... - A.Wayne 16:15:24 08/28/15 (1)
- RE: And yet...height is important when not fixed .... - josh358 06:45:12 08/29/15 (0)
- RE: And yet...yet , yet - A.Wayne 11:13:40 08/21/15 (0)
- RE: And yet... - E-Stat 09:19:50 08/21/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - ahendler 19:19:32 08/20/15 (1)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - rick_m 20:01:07 08/20/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Dave_K 09:44:14 08/19/15 (4)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - hahax@verizon.net 20:54:21 08/19/15 (3)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Dave_K 05:10:28 08/20/15 (2)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - A.Wayne 05:55:25 08/20/15 (1)
- "worthy" is the key word - Dave_K 08:55:46 08/20/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers not mutually exclusive - A.Wayne 06:28:07 08/19/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Doug Schneider 05:05:41 08/19/15 (22)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - mark.korda@myfairpoint.net 06:30:01 08/19/15 (1)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - hahax@verizon.net 09:27:42 08/19/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - hahax@verizon.net 06:20:09 08/19/15 (19)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - ahendler 19:27:27 08/20/15 (1)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - hahax@verizon.net 09:28:38 08/21/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Doug Schneider 06:30:58 08/19/15 (16)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - hahax@verizon.net 09:29:16 08/19/15 (14)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Doug Schneider 13:38:37 08/19/15 (13)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Peter Breuninger 14:01:11 08/19/15 (12)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - MarkJohns 14:24:18 09/07/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - b.l.zeebub 23:15:04 08/19/15 (8)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - hahax@verizon.net 08:44:24 08/20/15 (6)
- I don't see why they couldn't use acoustic measurement tools - Dave_K 13:09:19 08/20/15 (5)
- RE: I don't see why they couldn't use acoustic measurement tools - hahax@verizon.net 16:26:40 08/20/15 (4)
- Disagree - Dave_K 08:38:28 08/21/15 (3)
- RE: Disagree - hahax@verizon.net 09:31:39 08/21/15 (0)
- RE: Disagree - A.Wayne 08:56:35 08/21/15 (1)
- LOL - Dave_K 03:12:21 08/22/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Doug Schneider 04:45:31 08/20/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - Doug Schneider 18:19:17 08/19/15 (1)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers, serious mags only - A.Wayne 20:17:45 08/19/15 (0)
- RE: Measurements vs. Reviewers - b.l.zeebub 06:52:50 08/19/15 (0)