|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: A couple more thoughts on "voicing" and "personality" posted by Brian H P on August 18, 2015 at 11:30:31:
Just a thought:
You need to re-create all conditions of that peak. It is pretty sharp. I believe a GEQ will have a much lower q cenetered around each frequency. Remember: A feedback destroyer works by finding reaonant frequencies, and filtering them out with ultra-sharp filters. Concidered to be inaudible, but a microphone set to 1/48th or higher woukd likely pick it up. Cool, but most times too much information is no good either because we then take it and fool ourselvs things are there, or not there, that are or arent....at a single point in space, one speaker driven, and so on. The complex sum of what we hear with both channels driven, room interaction, and HRTF's does not always mean a single responce measurement is quantifiable as "good information". Its a snapshot, like the Alamo, from one direction you see majestic history, from another you see 'meriga. More important that anything, and those very few I trust can weigh everything involved, and the summation of ALL data points concidered with good, well educated coorelations formed yeilds a very good picture. I am unsure any reviewer or publisher gets it right all the time however I am always inclined, when the data seems marginal, to aire tword the human expirence.
Edits: 08/18/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Using a graphic eq is not that easy.... - MZisserson 16:09:53 08/18/15 (1)
- Which is why mine got retired years ago - Brian H P 11:53:30 08/19/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
