|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Nope posted by E-Stat on June 24, 2015 at 15:30:47:
What? There's a speaker you think might be interesting and you never heard it? Not worth the trouble to go find it, perhaps? Oh dear, so there's a principle of selection besides actually listening to it. I thought you listened to everything!
I heard a speaker very much like that. The young man showing it at a dealer said it was McIntosh but maybe he was just using a name he thought I might recognize. I didn't take the time to experiment with it as I wasn't really interested at the time. I just played my favorite orchestral test piece and quickly found it colored. But the speakers may have been too close for the best effect.
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- IDS 25 - Pat D 06:19:39 06/25/15 (27)
- RE: IDS 25 - E-Stat 06:35:21 06/25/15 (26)
- RE: IDS 25 - A.Wayne 09:02:07 06/25/15 (25)
- Would you care - E-Stat 09:51:19 06/25/15 (24)
- You have to agree - coherency, imaging, soundstaging etc. can NOT be all that important anyway,... - carcass93 11:17:19 06/26/15 (3)
- If you recall... - E-Stat 11:27:47 06/26/15 (2)
- Have to admit this has been a most amusing thread - kerr 11:54:35 06/26/15 (1)
- Opinions certainly differ - E-Stat 12:02:11 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: Would you care - A.Wayne 11:41:26 06/25/15 (19)
- Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 11:45:09 06/25/15 (18)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue, then look in the mirror - A.Wayne 13:50:29 06/25/15 (7)
- Validity of the measurements is very much the topic - E-Stat 15:10:23 06/25/15 (6)
- The tester does not acknowledge them to be "clearly wrong" - Dave_K 10:09:06 06/26/15 (3)
- If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - E-Stat 10:19:18 06/26/15 (2)
- RE: If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - Dave_K 12:07:22 06/26/15 (1)
- RE: If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - E-Stat 12:43:30 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: Validity of the measurements is very much the topic - A.Wayne 04:58:32 06/26/15 (1)
- Once again - E-Stat 05:24:49 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 13:42:20 06/25/15 (8)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 13:53:47 06/25/15 (7)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 17:06:27 06/26/15 (3)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 17:41:08 06/26/15 (2)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 18:17:18 06/26/15 (1)
- I'll try again from my previous post - E-Stat 10:38:18 06/27/15 (0)
- "image height measurements.... soundstage depth measurements" - you're guaranteed ... - carcass93 14:48:50 06/26/15 (1)
- Naturally - E-Stat 15:04:05 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - A.Wayne 13:57:49 06/25/15 (0)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - A.Wayne 13:39:55 06/25/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
