In Reply to: RE: Woe is you, right? posted by Pat D on June 24, 2015 at 11:21:12:
On the other hand, I never had any particular desire to have dinner with Dr. West of Soundlab.
Forget the specific as that was an example. Wouldn't you like to have a long conversation with any designer of gear you have? Wouldn't you like to understand their philosophy and take on musical reproduction? Perhaps it would impress you more to say I met Keven Voecks at Sea Cliff years ago. Along with other designers I haven't mentioned.
I sure do. And have.
There are lots of speakers that you and your folks with trusted ears never heard,
Perhaps. Has anyone heard them? Does anyone find they are worthy?
Actually, a good set of speaker measurements from the NRC (Soundstage) or Stereophile can be a very useful tool,
Maybe for you, but not for me. They don't provide enough useful information about imaging in many different ways nor about coherency.
your prejudices about little boxes would keep you from auditioning the superb Ethera Vitae
I'll go out on a limb and say that a two way box with an 8" woofer could never provide a lifelike sized image to me. I found the same to be true with the Quad electrostat. I was always aware of listening down to them. BTW, Siggy Linkwitz finds the same to be true.
"Vertical height of the sound stage adds to its realism. I find small 2-way speakers very unsatisfactory in this respect, even when they are correctly positioned at ear level height."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 13:09:03 06/24/15 (32)
- RE: Woe is you, right? - Pat D 14:24:26 06/24/15 (31)
- RE: Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 14:45:37 06/24/15 (30)
- RE: Woe is you, right? - Pat D 15:10:51 06/24/15 (29)
- Nope - E-Stat 15:30:47 06/24/15 (28)
- IDS 25 - Pat D 06:19:39 06/25/15 (27)
- RE: IDS 25 - E-Stat 06:35:21 06/25/15 (26)
- RE: IDS 25 - A.Wayne 09:02:07 06/25/15 (25)
- Would you care - E-Stat 09:51:19 06/25/15 (24)
- You have to agree - coherency, imaging, soundstaging etc. can NOT be all that important anyway,... - carcass93 11:17:19 06/26/15 (3)
- If you recall... - E-Stat 11:27:47 06/26/15 (2)
- Have to admit this has been a most amusing thread - kerr 11:54:35 06/26/15 (1)
- Opinions certainly differ - E-Stat 12:02:11 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: Would you care - A.Wayne 11:41:26 06/25/15 (19)
- Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 11:45:09 06/25/15 (18)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue, then look in the mirror - A.Wayne 13:50:29 06/25/15 (7)
- Validity of the measurements is very much the topic - E-Stat 15:10:23 06/25/15 (6)
- The tester does not acknowledge them to be "clearly wrong" - Dave_K 10:09:06 06/26/15 (3)
- If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - E-Stat 10:19:18 06/26/15 (2)
- RE: If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - Dave_K 12:07:22 06/26/15 (1)
- RE: If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - E-Stat 12:43:30 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: Validity of the measurements is very much the topic - A.Wayne 04:58:32 06/26/15 (1)
- Once again - E-Stat 05:24:49 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 13:42:20 06/25/15 (8)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 13:53:47 06/25/15 (7)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 17:06:27 06/26/15 (3)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 17:41:08 06/26/15 (2)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 18:17:18 06/26/15 (1)
- I'll try again from my previous post - E-Stat 10:38:18 06/27/15 (0)
- "image height measurements.... soundstage depth measurements" - you're guaranteed ... - carcass93 14:48:50 06/26/15 (1)
- Naturally - E-Stat 15:04:05 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - A.Wayne 13:57:49 06/25/15 (0)
- RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - A.Wayne 13:39:55 06/25/15 (0)