Woe is you, right?

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - Merlot_cat 07:54:23 06/19/15 (194)

Could Stereophile ... - Bromo33333 07:24:31 07/30/15 (1)

RE: Could Stereophile ... - A.Wayne 14:42:18 07/30/15 (0)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - rnhood 17:10:32 06/29/15 (2)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - John Atkinson 17:26:53 06/29/15 (1)

This is more of an FYI...HK/Limage set-up... - Mark Man 19:20:31 06/29/15 (0)

Easy decision - mbnx01 13:25:16 06/21/15 (3)

RE: Easy decision - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 15:51:53 06/25/15 (0)

RE: Easy decision - Pat D 14:36:11 06/24/15 (0)

Yes - Frihed89 08:37:38 06/22/15 (0)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - RGA 03:16:11 06/21/15 (81)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - Pat D 13:02:21 06/21/15 (80)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - RGA 18:22:15 06/21/15 (1)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - Peter Breuninger 14:47:27 06/29/15 (0)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - E-Stat 16:04:09 06/21/15 (77)

! - thetubeguy1954 10:32:48 07/06/15 (9)

Hi Tom - E-Stat 10:44:17 07/06/15 (8)

RE: Hi Tom - thetubeguy1954 13:52:45 07/07/15 (7)

RE: Hi Tom - jamestavegia@gmail.com 15:34:19 07/09/15 (6)

RE: Hi Tom - thetubeguy1954 01:31:50 07/14/15 (4)

RE: Hi Tom - jamestavegia@gmail.com 04:47:49 07/14/15 (2)

RE: Hi Jim - A.Wayne 09:12:17 07/14/15 (1)

RE: Hi Jim - jamestavegia@gmail.com 11:41:48 07/14/15 (0)

RE: Hi Tom - A.Wayne 02:46:46 07/14/15 (0)

RE: Measuremets are Important to some - A.Wayne 11:25:38 07/13/15 (0)

Sorry but... - lancelot 17:14:30 06/23/15 (25)

If you recall - E-Stat 17:41:49 06/23/15 (24)

RE: If you recall - Pat D 14:51:07 06/24/15 (22)

Sorry you've missed the topic - E-Stat 14:57:21 06/24/15 (21)

RE: Sorry you've missed the topic - Pat D 15:54:18 06/24/15 (20)

RE: Sorry you've missed the topic - John Atkinson 07:18:06 06/25/15 (1)

RE: Sorry you've missed the topic / thank you [n.t.a.] - wangmr 07:32:33 06/25/15 (0)

RE: Sorry you've missed the topic - E-Stat 16:16:53 06/24/15 (17)

I have never gotton goose-bumps looking at measurements... - Mark Man 19:33:48 06/24/15 (16)

Do you get goose bumps reading reviews and ads? - Pat D 05:33:08 06/25/15 (14)

RE: Do you get goose bumps reading reviews and ads? - Mark Man 08:21:59 06/25/15 (13)

RE: Do you get goose bumps reading reviews and ads? - Pat D 14:30:19 06/25/15 (12)

Red Herring alert - E-Stat 16:02:42 06/25/15 (11)

RE: Red Herring alert, more E-Stat Dogma attack ... - A.Wayne 04:17:21 06/26/15 (4)

RE: Red Herring alert, more E-Stat Dogma attack ... - morricab 15:20:45 07/06/15 (2)

RE: Red Herring alert, more E-Stat Dogma attack ... - DrChaos 16:45:48 07/09/15 (0)

RE: Red Herring alert, more E-Stat Dogma attack ... - A.Wayne 20:12:34 07/06/15 (0)

I never expected you - E-Stat 05:23:38 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Red Herring alert - Pat D 20:21:53 06/25/15 (5)

Conversely, Pat... there have been some reviewers whom IF they did NOT like them... made a point of listening - Cleantimestream 10:02:25 06/28/15 (0)

RE: Red Herring alert - E-Stat 05:30:50 06/26/15 (3)

RE: Red Herring alert - Pat D 15:22:38 06/26/15 (2)

RE: Red Herring alert - E-Stat 15:30:26 06/26/15 (1)

Misdirection alert! - Pat D 18:01:00 06/26/15 (0)

goose-bumps - hifitommy 21:16:55 06/24/15 (0)

RE: If you recall - lancelot 18:56:37 06/23/15 (0)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - Pat D 08:33:06 06/22/15 (40)

Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 08:49:54 06/22/15 (39)

RE: Woe is you, right? - Pat D 11:21:12 06/24/15 (33)

RE: Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 13:09:03 06/24/15 (32)

RE: Woe is you, right? - Pat D 14:24:26 06/24/15 (31)

RE: Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 14:45:37 06/24/15 (30)

RE: Woe is you, right? - Pat D 15:10:51 06/24/15 (29)

Nope - E-Stat 15:30:47 06/24/15 (28)

IDS 25 - Pat D 06:19:39 06/25/15 (27)

RE: IDS 25 - E-Stat 06:35:21 06/25/15 (26)

RE: IDS 25 - A.Wayne 09:02:07 06/25/15 (25)

Would you care - E-Stat 09:51:19 06/25/15 (24)

You have to agree - coherency, imaging, soundstaging etc. can NOT be all that important anyway,... - carcass93 11:17:19 06/26/15 (3)

If you recall... - E-Stat 11:27:47 06/26/15 (2)

Have to admit this has been a most amusing thread - kerr 11:54:35 06/26/15 (1)

Opinions certainly differ - E-Stat 12:02:11 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Would you care - A.Wayne 11:41:26 06/25/15 (19)

Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 11:45:09 06/25/15 (18)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue, then look in the mirror - A.Wayne 13:50:29 06/25/15 (7)

Validity of the measurements is very much the topic - E-Stat 15:10:23 06/25/15 (6)

The tester does not acknowledge them to be "clearly wrong" - Dave_K 10:09:06 06/26/15 (3)

If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - E-Stat 10:19:18 06/26/15 (2)

RE: If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - Dave_K 12:07:22 06/26/15 (1)

RE: If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - E-Stat 12:43:30 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Validity of the measurements is very much the topic - A.Wayne 04:58:32 06/26/15 (1)

Once again - E-Stat 05:24:49 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 13:42:20 06/25/15 (8)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 13:53:47 06/25/15 (7)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 17:06:27 06/26/15 (3)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 17:41:08 06/26/15 (2)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 18:17:18 06/26/15 (1)

I'll try again from my previous post - E-Stat 10:38:18 06/27/15 (0)

"image height measurements.... soundstage depth measurements" - you're guaranteed ... - carcass93 14:48:50 06/26/15 (1)

Naturally - E-Stat 15:04:05 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - A.Wayne 13:57:49 06/25/15 (0)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - A.Wayne 13:39:55 06/25/15 (0)

RE: Woe is you, right? - A.Wayne 10:24:18 06/22/15 (4)

RE: Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 11:48:23 06/22/15 (3)

RE: Woe is you, right? - A.Wayne 12:26:28 06/22/15 (2)

Your version is.... - carcass93 11:53:24 06/23/15 (1)

RE: Your version is.... - A.Wayne 12:01:29 06/23/15 (0)

JA has commented previously - E-Stat 10:52:46 06/19/15 (39)

RE: JA has commented previously, - A.Wayne 12:16:05 06/19/15 (33)

RE: JA has commented previously, - E-Stat 13:22:14 06/19/15 (32)

RE: JA has commented previously, - Pat D 16:31:23 06/20/15 (31)

RE: JA has commented previously, - A.Wayne 20:17:40 06/20/15 (11)

RE: JA has commented previously, - Pat D 11:34:12 06/24/15 (0)

Contentious Panel Speaker Measurements - John Atkinson 08:10:14 06/21/15 (9)

"Proprietary information" - Brian H P 16:18:18 06/22/15 (2)

RE: "Proprietary information" - John Atkinson 09:01:12 06/23/15 (1)

RE: "Proprietary information" - Bill Leebens 08:57:56 07/16/15 (0)

Speaking only for myself... - Ivan303 09:32:26 06/21/15 (0)

RE: Contentious Panel Speaker Measurements - A.Wayne 08:32:27 06/21/15 (4)

RE: Contentious Panel Speaker Measurements - John Atkinson 11:01:40 06/22/15 (2)

RE: Contentious Panel Speaker Measurements - DrChaos 16:44:52 06/22/15 (1)

RE: Contentious Panel Speaker Measurements - Norman M 21:38:26 06/22/15 (0)

RE: Contentious Panel Speaker Measurements - kentaja 11:45:36 06/21/15 (0)

I return to JA's comments - E-Stat 18:09:44 06/20/15 (18)

RE: I return to JA's comments - Pat D 12:01:19 06/21/15 (15)

Quasi-anechoic vs. real rooms - Brian H P 16:32:02 06/22/15 (0)

Are you kidding? - E-Stat 13:47:21 06/21/15 (10)

RE: Are you kidding? - Pat D 07:48:25 06/22/15 (9)

RE: Are you kidding? - regmac 14:35:57 06/22/15 (7)

RE: Are you kidding? - A.Wayne 15:50:58 06/22/15 (6)

RE: Are you kidding? - Pat D 10:45:34 06/24/15 (5)

RE: Are you kidding? - A.Wayne 11:58:02 06/24/15 (4)

RE: Are you kidding? really - A.Wayne 13:00:04 07/06/15 (0)

RE: Are you kidding? - Pat D 13:49:30 06/24/15 (2)

RE: Are you kidding? - A.Wayne 17:27:30 06/24/15 (0)

You're not paying attention - E-Stat 15:38:24 06/24/15 (0)

RE: Are you kidding? - E-Stat 07:56:09 06/22/15 (0)

RE: I return to JA's comments - John N 13:13:27 06/21/15 (2)

RE: I return to JA's comments - Pat D 07:52:20 06/22/15 (0)

RE: I return to JA's comments and best to note - A.Wayne 15:54:09 06/21/15 (0)

that puts a new spin on what is REALLY subjective... objectiveness is an illusion... an old warhorse arguement - Cleantimestream 11:09:25 06/21/15 (0)

RE: "not representative in any sense of real world performance" - Ivan303 09:25:51 06/21/15 (0)

RE: JA has commented previously - Mark Man 11:19:13 06/19/15 (4)

RE: JA has commented previously - E-Stat 11:38:20 06/19/15 (3)

Yes...My thoghts exactly... - Mark Man 11:57:26 06/19/15 (2)

RE: Yes...My thoghts exactly... - E-Stat 13:18:33 06/19/15 (1)

NIce.. - Mark Man 13:50:03 06/19/15 (0)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - John Atkinson 08:40:45 06/19/15 (62)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - A.Wayne 09:20:50 06/19/15 (61)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - John Atkinson 10:38:25 06/19/15 (41)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - A.Wayne 12:23:46 06/19/15 (6)

Column vs full review... - mkuller 14:59:43 06/20/15 (1)

RE: Column vs full review... - A.Wayne 16:31:07 06/20/15 (0)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - John Atkinson 06:18:48 06/20/15 (2)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - A.Wayne 06:33:55 06/20/15 (1)

RE: Stereophile cannot test every item .... - A.Wayne 06:43:19 06/20/15 (0)

RE: Stereophile to review Magnepan!?.... - Jeffrey Lee 15:31:52 06/19/15 (0)

JA...Riddle me this please... - Mark Man 11:15:03 06/19/15 (33)

RE: JA...Riddle me this please... - unclestu 11:37:55 06/19/15 (32)

he has not 'loosened up with age' ... - mbnx01 11:16:00 06/20/15 (0)

RE: JA...Riddle me this please... - E-Stat 11:44:00 06/19/15 (30)

RE: JA...Riddle me this please... - unclestu 14:34:51 06/19/15 (29)

James Bongiorno use Triple Maggies - Des 16:18:49 06/21/15 (0)

Double panels you say? - E-Stat 14:43:37 06/19/15 (27)

RE: Double panels you say? - RGA 19:13:11 06/21/15 (2)

Two peas in a pod, right? - E-Stat 19:33:28 06/21/15 (1)

BOOM...Drop the mic... - Mark Man 06:59:31 06/22/15 (0)

RE: Double panels you say? - Ivan303 13:21:12 06/20/15 (2)

Actually - E-Stat 14:14:59 06/20/15 (1)

I was a RMAF when Ray was running four double panels in a BIG room... - Ivan303 15:34:46 06/20/15 (0)

Heard them at CES - unclestu 15:56:30 06/19/15 (16)

Why wouldn't they last...Just Curious??? - Mark Man 21:05:08 06/19/15 (13)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - unclestu 10:51:27 06/22/15 (12)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - Mark Man 11:04:10 06/22/15 (9)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - kentaja 13:45:19 06/22/15 (8)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - unclestu 11:44:38 06/24/15 (7)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - kentaja 11:55:11 06/24/15 (6)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - unclestu 12:35:51 06/26/15 (5)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - kentaja 15:12:48 06/26/15 (4)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - unclestu 15:54:39 06/26/15 (3)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - kentaja 16:12:29 06/26/15 (2)

RE: cortec - unclestu 17:57:50 06/26/15 (1)

RE: Thanks! NT - kentaja 08:26:23 06/27/15 (0)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - A.Wayne 10:54:44 06/22/15 (1)

RE: Why wouldn't they last - kentaja 13:46:30 06/22/15 (0)

"Too bad stats don't last in my area ( five years max)." - E-Stat 19:49:30 06/19/15 (1)

RE: "Too bad stats don't last in my area ( five years max)." - acres verde 12:39:53 06/20/15 (0)

DAMN...that is a big set of headphones... - Mark Man 15:09:30 06/19/15 (3)

X350.5s - E-Stat 15:26:03 06/19/15 (2)

Yep, that's the set up I remember at RMAF... - Ivan303 18:10:02 06/20/15 (0)

I am only somewhat familar with the SL line-up... - Mark Man 15:41:10 06/19/15 (0)

Standard protocol, actually - Brian H P 10:38:01 06/19/15 (18)

And if I recall, it means they are ineligible for Recommended Components.... - AAG 12:26:37 06/19/15 (17)

I do not believe that your recollection is accurate as concerns the last 10 years or so - John Marks 14:52:13 06/19/15 (16)

RE: I do not believe that your recollection is accurate as concerns the last 10 years or so - John Atkinson 04:35:29 06/20/15 (0)

Well, that really is interesting... - AAG 15:04:10 06/19/15 (14)

My favorite Political Science joke! - John Marks 04:30:46 06/20/15 (9)

Absolutely it does... - AAG 12:35:50 06/20/15 (4)

RE: Absolutely it does... - John Atkinson 08:00:22 06/21/15 (3)

Thank you for the clarification and confirmation... - AAG 13:10:49 06/21/15 (2)

RE: Thank you for the clarification and confirmation... - John Atkinson 04:04:09 06/22/15 (1)

Thanks - AAG 13:15:19 06/22/15 (0)

Absolutely it does... - AAG 09:43:53 06/20/15 (3)

"Columnists" are required to file their copy in Unrhymed Iambic Pentameter - John Marks 10:17:06 06/20/15 (2)

Thanks John - AAG 13:04:27 06/20/15 (1)

AFAIK, the only "policy" input from me is, "Do I want to shout it from the rooftops?" - John Marks 17:10:13 06/20/15 (0)

RE: Well, that really is interesting... - Jeffrey Lee 15:24:42 06/19/15 (3)

That may be true... - AAG 15:46:28 06/19/15 (1)

RE: That may be true...errr not - A.Wayne 15:51:09 06/19/15 (0)

RE: Well, that really is interesting... - A.Wayne 15:42:28 06/19/15 (0)

Follow Ups

Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 08:49:54 06/22/15 (39)

RE: Woe is you, right? - Pat D 11:21:12 06/24/15 (33)

RE: Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 13:09:03 06/24/15 (32)

RE: Woe is you, right? - Pat D 14:24:26 06/24/15 (31)

RE: Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 14:45:37 06/24/15 (30)

RE: Woe is you, right? - Pat D 15:10:51 06/24/15 (29)

Nope - E-Stat 15:30:47 06/24/15 (28)

IDS 25 - Pat D 06:19:39 06/25/15 (27)

RE: IDS 25 - E-Stat 06:35:21 06/25/15 (26)

RE: IDS 25 - A.Wayne 09:02:07 06/25/15 (25)

Would you care - E-Stat 09:51:19 06/25/15 (24)

You have to agree - coherency, imaging, soundstaging etc. can NOT be all that important anyway,... - carcass93 11:17:19 06/26/15 (3)

If you recall... - E-Stat 11:27:47 06/26/15 (2)

Have to admit this has been a most amusing thread - kerr 11:54:35 06/26/15 (1)

Opinions certainly differ - E-Stat 12:02:11 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Would you care - A.Wayne 11:41:26 06/25/15 (19)

Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 11:45:09 06/25/15 (18)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue, then look in the mirror - A.Wayne 13:50:29 06/25/15 (7)

Validity of the measurements is very much the topic - E-Stat 15:10:23 06/25/15 (6)

The tester does not acknowledge them to be "clearly wrong" - Dave_K 10:09:06 06/26/15 (3)

If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - E-Stat 10:19:18 06/26/15 (2)

RE: If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - Dave_K 12:07:22 06/26/15 (1)

RE: If the test assumption is clearly wrong, then...? - E-Stat 12:43:30 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Validity of the measurements is very much the topic - A.Wayne 04:58:32 06/26/15 (1)

Once again - E-Stat 05:24:49 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 13:42:20 06/25/15 (8)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 13:53:47 06/25/15 (7)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 17:06:27 06/26/15 (3)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - E-Stat 17:41:08 06/26/15 (2)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - Pat D 18:17:18 06/26/15 (1)

I'll try again from my previous post - E-Stat 10:38:18 06/27/15 (0)

"image height measurements.... soundstage depth measurements" - you're guaranteed ... - carcass93 14:48:50 06/26/15 (1)

Naturally - E-Stat 15:04:05 06/26/15 (0)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - A.Wayne 13:57:49 06/25/15 (0)

RE: Obviously, you don't a clue - A.Wayne 13:39:55 06/25/15 (0)

RE: Woe is you, right? - A.Wayne 10:24:18 06/22/15 (4)

RE: Woe is you, right? - E-Stat 11:48:23 06/22/15 (3)

RE: Woe is you, right? - A.Wayne 12:26:28 06/22/15 (2)

Your version is.... - carcass93 11:53:24 06/23/15 (1)

RE: Your version is.... - A.Wayne 12:01:29 06/23/15 (0)

Post a Message!