In Reply to: RE: What you mean "WE?" nt posted by geezerrocket on May 12, 2015 at 07:47:58:
A ST blog would interest me too, so long as it's not here and does not involve incessant sniping at an organization that he worked with and contributed to for decades. Seems to me he was a participant in the very alleged sins he now finds so amusing to mock. I'm sick of that. And I bet "some others of us" are too.
___
"If you are the owner of a new stereophonic system, this record will play with even more brilliant true-to-life fidelity. In short, you can purchase this record with no fear of its becoming obsolete in the future."
Edits: 05/12/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Then "some of us" would have been more accurate than "we" . . . - JoshT 13:12:09 05/12/15 (3)
- RE: Then "some of us" would have been more accurate than "we" . . . - standingstones 17:38:53 05/12/15 (0)
- Why can't he say what he likes? Everybody else does. nt - DAP 13:16:26 05/12/15 (1)
- I didn't say he couldn't - JoshT 13:54:16 05/12/15 (0)