In Reply to: Unsavory? That's a nice word. posted by samtellig on February 20, 2015 at 09:14:43:
I am very sorry to see this sort of thing on a public forum. Sam, I have admired your work very much for a long time, but the public airing of these kinds of private issues is not going to lead any reasonable person to decide them against Stereophile and, to me, is only going to tarnish your reputation among hobbyists who otherwise hold you in very high regard. Just saying, the rest is up to you.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Unsavory? That's a nice word. - faskenite 17:35:30 02/20/15 (8)
- I do not see it as malace. It is a question which was ASKED, and politely answered. Period. nt - Nuit 21:07:08 02/21/15 (0)
- RE: Unsavory? That's a nice word. - standingstones 21:15:00 02/20/15 (6)
- As I got older, I got more and more tired of "liberal" writers who provide product guidance for the filthy rich.(nt) - samtellig 07:40:37 02/21/15 (5)
- RE: As I got older, I got more and more tired of "liberal" writers who provide product guidance for the filthy rich.(nt) - lord addleford 10:52:41 02/21/15 (3)
- RE: As I got older, I got more and more tired of "liberal" writers who provide product guidance for the filthy rich.(nt) - analogcorner 13:33:26 02/24/15 (2)
- Maybe "Mikey' watches Fox News more than I do. I don't watch at all. Ted Cruz for President!(nt) - samtellig 10:09:48 02/27/15 (0)
- RE: As I got older, I got more and more tired of "liberal" writers who provide product guidance for the filthy rich.(nt) - Sprezza Tura 14:09:45 02/24/15 (0)
- Sums it up succintly. nt - Rick W 08:54:53 02/21/15 (0)