In Reply to: RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: posted by Dave_K on December 5, 2014 at 11:26:08:
Is that the Atkinson "all DBTs produce nulls, I hear a difference, so DBTs can't be right "argument" " dressed up in different garb?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - middleground 14:06:32 12/05/14 (50)
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Tony Lauck 18:46:23 12/05/14 (48)
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Pat D 19:55:26 12/06/14 (11)
- Scientific method? - mkuller 12:16:37 12/07/14 (8)
- RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 16:00:43 12/08/14 (7)
- RE: Scientific method? - Tony Lauck 18:40:40 12/08/14 (0)
- RE: Scientific method? - mkuller 16:44:52 12/08/14 (5)
- RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 18:54:10 12/08/14 (4)
- RE: Scientific method? - mkuller 12:07:14 12/09/14 (3)
- RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 20:07:13 12/09/14 (2)
- RE: Scientific method? - mkuller 20:11:39 12/09/14 (1)
- RE: Scientific method? - Pat D 20:38:40 12/09/14 (0)
- And yet... - E-Stat 08:41:40 12/07/14 (1)
- Novelty toy makers, not experimental scientists - Tony Lauck 15:19:26 12/07/14 (0)
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - John Atkinson 09:20:36 12/06/14 (35)
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Tony Lauck 10:45:15 12/06/14 (34)
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - stehno 12:26:05 12/14/14 (2)
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Tony Lauck 13:27:16 12/14/14 (1)
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - stehno 14:41:13 12/14/14 (0)
- BTW - E-Stat 14:36:06 12/07/14 (30)
- RE: BTW - Pat D 19:28:44 12/08/14 (29)
- RE: BTW - E-Stat 08:18:58 12/09/14 (28)
- RE: BTW - Pat D 20:15:00 12/09/14 (27)
- Finally, an accurate amplifier... - mkuller 21:37:45 12/09/14 (23)
- RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Pat D 13:50:13 12/10/14 (22)
- RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Tony Lauck 21:19:51 12/11/14 (8)
- RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Pat D 16:27:01 12/12/14 (7)
- RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Tony Lauck 17:40:55 12/12/14 (6)
- RE: Finally, an accurate amplifier... - Pat D 18:41:54 12/12/14 (1)
- Oh, you "suggest"? That's so generous of you.... - carcass93 15:25:40 12/13/14 (0)
- Sorry - E-Stat 18:04:08 12/12/14 (3)
- The only one you mention... - mkuller 11:07:39 12/11/14 (12)
- RE: The only one you mention... - Tony Lauck 21:17:01 12/11/14 (1)
- I always... - mkuller 10:40:54 12/12/14 (0)
- Ditto - E-Stat 11:59:45 12/11/14 (9)
- Maybe PatD will tell us... - mkuller 12:25:01 12/11/14 (8)
- Perhaps accurate for those who listen to - E-Stat 12:34:55 12/11/14 (7)
- RE: Perhaps accurate for those who listen to - Pat D 16:33:03 12/12/14 (6)
- Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST...(nt) - mkuller 10:06:19 12/13/14 (4)
- RE: Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST...(nt) - Pat D 11:12:03 12/14/14 (3)
- RE: Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST... - mkuller 11:28:15 12/14/14 (2)
- RE: Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST... - Pat D 10:43:51 12/15/14 (0)
- RE: Wrong amp - we're talking about the 4B-SST... - lord addleford 12:13:17 12/14/14 (0)
- Thanks for ongoing humor! - E-Stat 16:48:15 12/12/14 (0)
- RE: BTW - E-Stat 20:37:09 12/09/14 (2)
- RE: I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation: - Dave_K 14:37:31 12/05/14 (0)