In Reply to: RE: Illustrates the challenges of measuring dipole speaker performance posted by morricab on October 23, 2014 at 14:24:27:
and does not send samples for review to Stereophile. Perhaps not everyone is reminded at each review what JA has observed before:
"As I have written before in these pages, measuring physically large speakers with in-room quasi-anechoic techniques is in some ways a fruitless task. The usual assumption, that the measuring microphone is very much farther away than the largest dimension of the speaker being measured, is clearly wrong. Yet without access to a large anechoic chamber costing many hundreds of thousands of dollars, in-room measurement techniques are all we have to rely on."
That summarized the 3.6 review conducted back in 2000 - which I believe was the most recent example.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Magnepan has subsequently changed its policy - E-Stat 14:40:12 10/24/14 (5)
- And lookit the first page of the measurements - Brian H P 15:35:31 10/27/14 (4)
- RE: And lookit the first page of the measurements - John Atkinson 16:41:12 10/27/14 (2)
- How to measure a really big speaker - Brian H P 10:09:18 10/29/14 (1)
- RE: How to measure a really big speaker - BubbaMike 16:22:45 11/14/14 (0)
- Therein lies the challenge... - E-Stat 15:56:08 10/27/14 (0)