In Reply to: I have no problem with this. posted by mbnx01 on July 22, 2014 at 12:27:23:
Six Moons' "product" is equipment reviews. The "raw material" for this product is the equipment provided by manufacturers. No equipment, no reviews. No reviews, no product. No product, no business.
Six Moons is banking on enough people going to their website to read their reviews (i.e. "consume their product") so they can charge enough for advertising to be profitable.
Manufacturers provide this raw material for free. In addition, they pay for shipping both ways which can be rather expensive depending on the product in question. And of course once a reviewer has had their grubby little hands on a piece of gear for weeks or months, the manufacturer can no longer sell this piece of gear (rightly) as new, so it has to be discounted.
This in exchange for a review that may or may not garner enough sales to even recoup the costs of providing this raw material.
And you call these guys "freeloaders"?
Six Moons should be thanking their fucking lucky stars that manufacturers are willing to send them equipment for free to review (and say what you will about Consumer Reports, they PAY for everything they review).
Instead, they feel that manufacturers should pay them for the privilege of supplying them their raw materials.
What chutzpah!
I hope every manufacturer boycotts this pay-to-play scheme. And those who don't, whenever they make reference to any Six Moons review of theirs, they should disclose in the same space that they paid for that review. If not, I hope others make an effort to make it publicly known.
May pay-to-play crash and burn.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Freeloaders? - Barabajagal 15:54:57 07/22/14 (33)
- No, 6 Moons' PRODUCT is eyeballs.... - Ivan303 07:45:07 07/24/14 (2)
- Eyeballs are a DERIVATIVE product... - Barabajagal 08:10:50 07/24/14 (1)
- No, eyeballs ARE the product... - Ivan303 08:36:08 07/24/14 (0)
- +1 - Ralph 09:21:24 07/23/14 (1)
- RE: +1 - Barabajagal 09:40:34 07/23/14 (0)
- You have it right... - morricab 02:50:59 07/23/14 (0)
- RE: Freeloaders? - JTimothyA 23:09:41 07/22/14 (1)
- RE: Freeloaders? - Barabajagal 23:20:30 07/22/14 (0)
- RE: Freeloaders? - Sprezza Tura 17:43:44 07/22/14 (23)
- You shouldn't comment on things you really have no idea about - Cpk 05:30:28 07/23/14 (1)
- RE: You shouldn't comment on things you really have no idea about - Sprezza Tura 07:36:28 07/23/14 (0)
- RE: Freeloaders? - morricab 01:52:32 07/23/14 (0)
- RE: Freeloaders? - Barabajagal 18:49:28 07/22/14 (19)
- RE: Freeloaders? - RGA 10:28:30 07/23/14 (1)
- RE: Freeloaders? - morricab 14:31:03 07/23/14 (0)
- Steve, is that you? - Jim Austin 07:17:36 07/23/14 (12)
- You've blown my cover. I'm going to have to kill you now, Jim. ;-) - Barabajagal 07:52:43 07/23/14 (11)
- This is historic. - Jim Austin 07:57:14 07/23/14 (10)
- I believe that in the late 1980s or early 1990s there was an Indianapolis car... - John Marks 13:23:32 07/24/14 (0)
- RE: This is historic. - Barabajagal 08:18:08 07/23/14 (8)
- Pioneer doesn't count. - Jim Austin 08:24:40 07/23/14 (7)
- Does Bose count? - Barabajagal 08:40:55 07/23/14 (5)
- Hmmm. I guess. - Jim Austin 08:50:12 07/23/14 (4)
- RE: Hmmm. I guess. - RGA 11:42:00 07/28/14 (0)
- RE: Hmmm. I guess. - Barabajagal 08:53:42 07/23/14 (2)
- That's the one. - Jim Austin 09:03:15 07/23/14 (1)
- RE: That's the one. - Barabajagal 09:31:45 07/23/14 (0)
- RE: Pioneer doesn't count. - Barabajagal 08:37:23 07/23/14 (0)
- RE: Freeloaders? - Sprezza Tura 19:14:40 07/22/14 (1)
- RE: Freeloaders? - Barabajagal 20:18:06 07/22/14 (0)
- RE: Freeloaders? - Sprezza Tura 19:04:33 07/22/14 (1)
- RE: Freeloaders? - Barabajagal 20:07:09 07/22/14 (0)
- Oh, and for Pete's sake... - Barabajagal 16:11:40 07/22/14 (0)