In Reply to: RE: Took me a while, but I eventually I came to terms with reality. posted by mkuller on April 11, 2014 at 09:35:45:
I stated what IMO has been demonstrated to be a simple fact, and basically you confirmed what I said. As to your question.....Quite a while ago there was a discussion about loaners, and I and some others suggested mags identify which products listed in reviewers' assoc. comp. were bought/owned by the reviewers and which are loaners. Somebody at PF (believe it was Dave Clark) saw the discussion, commented favorably regarding the concept, and David Robinson at Positive Feedback implemented a change, which you can see at the top of linked page.
Is every product listed in each S'phile assoc. comp. bought/owned by the reviewer/columnist? Know the answer, Mike?
Edits: 04/11/14 04/11/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You should have just said you agree, 'cause....... - Rick W 10:10:22 04/11/14 (2)
- RE: You should have just said you agree, 'cause....... - mkuller 11:14:34 04/11/14 (1)
- "More transparency is always a good thing." Exactly. nt - Rick W 11:58:10 04/11/14 (0)