In Reply to: Stephen Mejias bids farewell to Stereophile posted by Sprezza Tura on March 28, 2014 at 20:54:01:
He was the only young reviewer among the ancient, and I mean ancient, current writers!
Who wants to only read 65 to 70+ year old's opinions?
What about opinions on, or reference music in reviews, recorded after 1990 or 2000?
All the other, old writers, do not listen to current music.
There is some good, recent music out there, but you will not find much at all for the under 50 crowd, yet anyone much younger, in Stereophile!
How do these readers relate to the reviews?
Stereophile is an "old man's" magazine!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- That is a shame! - DKC1 21:26:26 03/28/14 (16)
- RE: That is a shame! - Norman M 08:46:40 05/07/14 (0)
- RE: That is a shame! - Olde Bulldogge 14:04:48 03/29/14 (0)
- RE: Cheapshot - Gregg 04:16:23 03/29/14 (4)
- RE: Cheapshot - DKC1 10:48:55 03/29/14 (1)
- RE: Cheapshot - TheBrewmaster 17:05:40 04/27/14 (0)
- RE: Cheapshot - Sprezza Tura 08:22:16 03/29/14 (1)
- RE: Cheapshot - sudz1234@yahoo.com 09:33:52 03/30/14 (0)
- RE: That is a shame! - RGA 00:01:39 03/29/14 (7)
- RE: That is a shame! - Sprezza Tura 00:10:09 03/29/14 (6)
- Average is meaningless. - Rick W 14:55:15 03/30/14 (4)
- RE: Average is meaningless. - Sprezza Tura 19:44:58 03/30/14 (3)
- I'm talking about S'phile's claim. Its meaningless. nt - Rick W 15:09:28 04/04/14 (0)
- RE: Average is meaningless. - RGA 19:28:13 03/31/14 (1)
- RE: Average is meaningless. - Tony Lauck 21:41:25 03/31/14 (0)
- RE: That is a shame! - RGA 00:44:28 03/29/14 (0)
- RE: That is a shame! - Sprezza Tura 21:40:19 03/28/14 (0)